查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 新基因學的治理與政策議題:以基因檢測科技發展為例
- 兩岸三通的政治邏輯
- The Development of Supplementary Rules for 竍 Control Chart under Nonrandom Patterns
- 室內裝潢用材產銷之研究(2)省產造林木做為室內裝潢用材之品質管制及成本分析
- Neoliberal Diffusion and Regulatory Capture of Financial Rules: Lessons from the 2007~8 Global Financial Crisis
- 城市治理與土地利用規劃法律--一個科際整合法律的研究觀點
- 管制風險認知與環境永續發展:以新竹科學工業園區為例
- 塑化風險社會:塑化劑風暴背後之管制脈絡與結構分析
- 傳統農業縣的石化課題:檢視六輕環境爭議與治理困境
- 生命倫理與管制治理的調和:以中國人類胚胎幹細胞研究管制變遷為例
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 新基因學的治理與政策議題:以基因檢測科技發展為例=Governing the Technology Development of Genetic Testing: The Governance and Policy Issues in the New Genetics |
---|---|
作 者 | 賴沅暉; | 書刊名 | 行政暨政策學報 |
卷 期 | 38 2004.06[民93.06] |
頁 次 | 頁61-93 |
分類號 | 572.9 |
關鍵詞 | 新基因學; 治理; 政策制定; 基因檢測; 管制; New genetics; Genetic testing; Relation; Governance; Policy-making; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 新基因學的發展帶來了新型態的公共政策實務,於此健康的個人被進一步定隆為有免於罹患基因疾病風險的自由。而就如同其他的基因科技發展一般,基因檢測科技的快速發展與擴散已引起另一波新的治理與管理議題,尤其當治理政策社群試圖調和市民社會、科學界與產業界不同政治需求的衝突時,由諸多價值體系所形成新的政策的發展為例,探索目前大眾對於將基因檢測科技具體應用於各種層面,並形成廣大市場的憂慮。強調新基因學成功發展的同時必須建構新的社會-科技關係、新的市場與新型態的治理機制,並分析治理機制的配置如何無法自外於其他層面的社會-科技變遷而受到挑戰與轉變。 |
英文摘要 | The new genetics promises a new kind of public policy practice in which the health individual is defined by freedom from risk of genetic disease. Like other areas of gene technology, genetic testing poses novel regulatory problems for the governance policy community as it seeks to reconcile the conflicting political explore the political dynamic driving the search for new forms of regulation in human genetics, its content and institutional manifestations and its likely impact on the policy process of gene technology governance. This paper critically examines a number of assumptions underlying the genetic conception of health, the changing terms on which new genetics-based technology in testing areas has been regulated, and discusses some likely implications of the increasing use of the technologies of genetic testing and genetic counseling in the fulfillment of individual health objectives. They are used to illustrate and examine the proposition that shifts in the politics of governance and regulation has meant that the accountability for the social management of new technology is increasingly shared between the state and the public. The paper concludes by stressing the need for a thoroughgoing appraisal of the impact of new genetics on public policy practice. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。