頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 仁齋古義學與激進主義=仁斎古義学とラジカリズム、Ito Jinsai's Kogigaku and Radicalism |
---|---|
作者 | 子安宣邦; 陳瑋芬; | 書刊名 | 臺灣東亞文明研究學刊 |
卷期 | 1:1 2004.06[民93.06] |
頁次 | 頁133-144 |
分類號 | 131.6 |
關鍵詞 | 伊藤仁齋; 古義學; 近世漢學; 荻生徂徠; 論語; 激進主義; Ito Jinsai; Kogigaku; Tokugawa sinology; Ogyu Sorai; Analects; Radicalism; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 伊藤仁齋的古義學意味著由《論語》中解讀儒家文本。由《論語》進行解讀,意思是要徹底革新朱子那種以性理學概念來解讀經義、重構儒家思想的做法,試圖回歸儒學原典的解讀方式。如此一來,《論語》便成為一個批判基準(criterion),可以對儒家經典由文獻性、思想性角度展開批判。那麼,仁齋如何重新發現《論語》、又如何解讀《論語》呢? 徂徠學是基於與仁齋學相抗的立場形構而成的,本文透過仁齋學與徂徠學的比較,釐清仁齋學在文獻批判與思想批判兩種層面上的激進主義。 |
英文摘要 | The study of Itô Jinsai's Kogigaku is meant to interpret Confucian texts from the reading of Analects. This way of interpretation is a revolution against the approaches of Chu Xi's Neo-Confucianism and a return to the Confucian canons. In this way, the Analects serves as a new criterion for criticism so that Confucian canons could be approached from textual and philosophical perspectives. This article discusses in what way Jinsai rediscovers the Analects and how he inteprets them. Soraigaku is opposed to Jinsaigaku. Through a comparison of Jinsaigaku and Soraigaku, this article will clarify the radicalism of Jinsaigaku in terms of its textual and philosophical perspectives. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。