頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 發憤以抒情:論錢基博的「現代中國文學史」=Lyrical Fury: A Study of Qian Jibo's Modern History of Chinese Literature |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳岸峰; | 書刊名 | 漢學研究 |
卷 期 | 22:1=44 2004.06[民93.06] |
頁 次 | 頁325-356 |
分類號 | 820.9 |
關鍵詞 | 新文學運動; 白話文; 古典文學; 文學史; 錢基博; New literary movement; Vernacular literature; Classical literature; Literary history; Qian Jibo; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 在二十世紀二、三十年代間,正當新文學運動已取得相當的成就,而胡適又以其《白話文學史》為主導,意在重構中國文學史之際,錢基博的《現代中國文學史》以逆向的姿態,作出抗衡論述。本文從錢氏有關「文學」與「文學史觀」的探討出發,落實至審視其在《現代中國文學史》中的實踐。我們發現,錢氏在實踐中睽離了自己所懸舉的文學史理想。然而,本文所要揭示的並非其文學史理想能否實踐,而在於體味在新文學運動如日中天之際,一代舊文人面對社會、文化與傳統價值之轉變所流露的悲憤心態;同樣重要的是,藉此研究我們得以瞭解作為傳統文人的錢氏與新文學運動陣營者的不同立場之根本所在。 |
英文摘要 | Qian Jibo 錢基博 wrote and revised his Modern History of Chinese Literature 現代中國文學史 during the height of the New Literary Movement led by Hu Shih 胡適 ( whose own History of Vernacular Literature 白話文學史 was a remarkable milestone in the reconstruction of traditional literary history) as a challenge to the New Literary Movement’s understanding of literature and literary history. This essays starts by exploring Qian’s view of literature and the ideals and methodology of his literary history. Ironically, we find that he failed to live up to his ideals in his work, although such a problem does not lessen the value of this book. Our main concern is how he and other traditional literati like him responded to the New Literary Movement. Through a study of his book we can better understand the sorrow and the fury of a generation of traditional Chinese literati faced with unprecedented change in literature and moral values and, just as important1y, the fundamental differences between the views of Qian, a representative of traditional literati, and proponents of the New Literary Movement. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。