查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 世界貿易組織SPS協定第五條第七項之研究--爭端案例中關於暫時性措施要件與預防原則之評析
- 世界貿易組織之SPS協定關於風險評估與風險管理之規範體系與爭端案例研究
- WTO之SPS協定v生物安全議定書--就預防原則與風險型態論衝突之不必然性
- 論規範基因改良食品風險性之貿易措施在世界貿易組織下之同類產品議題
- WTO體系與國際環境法之互動(1):WTO下SPS協定與生物安全議定書之關係--以預防原則之解釋適用為例
- The Problems and Challenges Associated with World Trade Organization Accession Faced by Taiwan's Fishing Industry
- 世界貿易組織與北美自由貿易協定有關競爭規範之架構比較
- The Political Economy of Regional Trade Agreements in the Context of the WTO and Its Implications for Taiwan--GATT Article XXIV in Relation to NAFTA
- 基因改造食品之各國管理現況介紹
- 國際間對基因改造產品之貿易管理
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 世界貿易組織SPS協定第五條第七項之研究--爭端案例中關於暫時性措施要件與預防原則之評析=Research on the Article 5.7 of WTO-SPS Agreement--Provisional Measures and Precautionary Principle |
---|---|
作 者 | 牛惠之; | 書刊名 | 政大法學評論 |
卷 期 | 79 2004.06[民93.06] |
頁 次 | 頁257-311 |
分類號 | 558.2 |
關鍵詞 | 世界貿易組織; 暫時性措施; 預防原則; 食品安全檢驗與動物植物防疫檢疫措施協定; 科學證據; 自由貿易; 風險評估; 生物安全議定書; WTO; SPS Agreement; Provisional measures; Scientific evidence; Precautionary principle; Free trade; Risk assessment Biosafety Protocol; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文旨在處理WTO多邊貿易體系下之SPS協定中,規範關於科學證據不充分風險之第五條第七項之主要相關議題。SPS協定所規範之食品安全與動物、植物防疫檢疫措施,在制定時,需要依據科學證據或參照國際標準;但為顧及會員管理科學證據尚不充分之風險的特殊需求,SPS協定特別透過雙軌制之制度架構,與暫時性規範主要求,使得會員得以例外的不依據科學證據之相關規定,管理進口產品所可能攜帶之潛在風險。本文茲分別就SPS協定關於科學證據要求之制度架構、第五條第七項制定之內涵與重要性、爭端案例為第五條第七項所確立之四項要件,以及國際環境法下之預防原則與第五條第七項之關聯性,分別進行分析與探討;並試圖藉此呈現出科學證據對於SPS協定維繫自由貿易之重要功能性。最後,本文並嘗試藉由分析SPS協定第五條第七項之構成要件,以探討這些要件對於預防原則之內容具體化所可能具有之意義。 |
英文摘要 | It is Article 5.7 of the SPS Agreement that the present paper tends to deal with. The SPS Agreement is likely to be deemed as a trade agreement, which serves not only to protect human health, animal health and phytosanitary situation in all Members, but, most importantly, also to ensure all the measures applied would not constitute negative trade effects to globaltrade liberalization. Scientific evidence is applied in this agreement to bridge the relationship between these two aspects. Accordingly, the SPS Agreement is designed to offer a two-track mechanism for Members to establish measures necessary to the risk generated by the importation of foreign products not merely in the cases where a handful of scientific evidences are in place, but where relevant scientific evidence is not yet sufficient. The role of Article 5.7 is to provide a means to ensure the WTO Members can manage risk properly in the situations where the relevant scientific evidence is insufficient. Measures which are subject to Article 5.7 need to be provisional in nature and follow four requirements in adoption and implementation. To identify the importance of Article 5.7 of the SPS Agreement in regard to its very function for managing risk when scientific evidence remains unclear or insufficient, the present paper will first address the frameworks of SPS Agreement, then, move on to explore the four elements for applying Article 5.7, in addition to the connection between Article 5.7 and precautionary principle, which are debated, established and examined in three major WTO dispute settlement cases. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。