查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Retention or Abolition of the Death Penalty: An Enquiry into the Fundamental Philosophy of Human Rights
- Shelley's Views on the Punishment of Crime and Education
- 執法人員都支持死刑,不見得!
- 從懲治盜匪條例第二條第八款談唯一死刑制度違憲論
- The Politics of Morality Policy: An Event History Analysis of U.S. States Death Penalty Policy Adoption
- 從人權看死刑廢除與否的爭議
- 中國舊律關於「侍親緩刑」制度變遷概述
- 理性討論死刑存廢的空間何在﹖--從大法官解釋死刑合憲與否的司法態度談起
- 死刑廢止運動的社會意義
- 廢除死刑--進行中之國際共識
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | Retention or Abolition of the Death Penalty: An Enquiry into the Fundamental Philosophy of Human Rights=死刑存廢:基本人權哲學探討 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 雷敦龢; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
| 卷 期 | 31:5=360 2004.05[民93.05] |
| 頁 次 | 頁103-131 |
| 專 輯 | 廢除死刑專題 |
| 分類號 | 587.215 |
| 關鍵詞 | 死刑; 基本人權哲學; 全體性; 革命科學; Death penalty; Fundamental philosophy of human rights; Comprehensiveness; Revolutionary science; |
| 語 文 | 英文(English) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文由基本人權哲學探討死刑存廢的態度,認為某些哲學無法適當地表達人權思想。而且在衡量那些適當的哲學時,其全體關懷是主要表準。有本文認為基本哲學的作用相當於科學典範的概念,如同典範超越常規科學的研究,所以基本人權哲學提供更高的角度來觀察人權議題。因此推動廢除死刑者不僅要以理性證明其有理,更要引起人心轉變使反對者以新的眼光看到人的意義。 |
| 英文摘要 | This paper explores the value of studying attitudes to the death penalty form the point of view of a fundamental philosophy of human rights. In argues that certain philosophies are inadequate for expressing the notion of human rights as such and, in the case of adequate philosophies, that the more comprehensive the theory is the better. The paper concludes that the role of a fundamental philosophy is to shape the whole discourse in which the discussion takes place, in much the same way that the basic paradigms of scientific theory lie over and above the practices of normal science. Hence in persuading others to adopt an abolitionist perspective, it is necessary to encourage a change of heart that sees the person in a new light. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。