查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 律師工作權(職業自由)之限制--法律扶助工作為律師之義務抑或權利?=Restriction of Lawyer's Occupational Liberty--Should Lawyer Take on the Duty of Doing Legal Aid? |
---|---|
作 者 | 張哲源; | 書刊名 | 東海大學法學研究 |
卷 期 | 20 2004.06[民93.06] |
頁 次 | 頁41-111 |
分類號 | 586.7 |
關鍵詞 | 律師; 公證人; 法律扶助; 執業獨立原則; 平等原則; 三階段理論; 公設辯護人; Rechtsanwalt; Notar; Rechtshilfe; Unabhangigkeitsprinzip; Gleichheitsprinzip; Drei-Stufe-Theorie; Staatlicher rechtsanwalt; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 法律扶助制度在歐美等先進國家早已行之有年。我國終於在今年初正式公布施行。此法實為我國保護人民司法權之重要里程碑。其中該法明定律師有法律扶助之義務。然則是否保障人民之訴訟權非得須強制律師負如此之義務?是否律師之責任,如同立法理由所述,律師因具公益性質,故律師須負法律扶助之義務?本文以此一論點為出發,討論法律扶助法中對於律師扶助義務之合憲性。 |
英文摘要 | Legal aid system had been established in the Western states for years. We have finally come to promulgte the law and to implement a legal aid system this year. This law is indeed a milestone for protection of people’s judicial right in this country. The law stated explicitly that there is a duty for lawyers to provide legal aid to the poor and needy. However, is it imperative to impose lawyers such a duty in order to protect people’s litigation right? Is it the responsibility of lawyers, as the reason stated in the legislation, that the legal profession itself being borne with a public good nature, thus lawyers must take on the duty of doing pro bono? Based on this premise, this article will further discussed the constitutionality of the provisions of Legal Aid Law mandating lawyers to provide pro bono legal services. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。