頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 羅欽順思想研究--從其批判陽明心學談起=Research on Luo Qing-Shuen's Thoughts: His Criticism at Wang Yang-Ming's Innateness |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳秀玉; | 書刊名 | 宜蘭大學學報 |
卷 期 | 2 2004.03[民93.03] |
頁 次 | 頁105-112 |
分類號 | 126.4 |
關鍵詞 | 羅欽順; 王陽明; 心性; 朱熹; 攻擊心學; 理氣; Luo qing-shuen; Wang yang-ming; Zhu xi; Criticism at the perspective of innateness; Li and qi; Mind and nature; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 羅欽順生於明代中葉,與王陽明同時,先研究禪學,自信得悟,後讀儒家聖賢書,漸覺所悟禪理,乃心的虛靈之妙,不是人性的理,於是轉向儒學,攻擊佛學,以王學講心,也極力反對。所講格物、心性、修身,都承繼宋儒朱熹的思想,而講理氣卻有所別,又強調人欲出於天,只要是順天則,沒有禁止的理由,突破了傳統禮教的禁慾主義,樹立了明代中葉的特殊學風。 |
英文摘要 | Luo Qing-Shuen, Wang yang-Ming's contemporary, was born in the middle Ming dynasty. At first he studied Buddhism and believed to attain the inspiration. As later investigating Confucian classics, however, he came to realize that his inspiration of Buddhism was actually the fictitious insight and no so-called "Li" in the human nature. As a result, he turned to Confucianism, delivered attacks on the Buddhistic perspective, and contended with Wang, who exclusively put emphasis on the innateness. With respect to the examination of the universal rationale, innateness and human nature, and self-cultivation he followed the thoughts from Zhu Xi, a Confucianist in the Song Dynasty, holding nonetheless different viewpoints regarding the notions "Li" und "Qi". In addition he asserted that desires stemmed from the human nature. As long as people behaved themselves conforming with the natural rules, there existed no reason to prohibit their desires. Luo broke therefore through the abstinence of the traditional moralism and established the outstanding academic atmosphere in the middle Ming Dynasty. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。