查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 農地管制下對農地財產權之保障與侵害=Protection and Impairment for Farmland Property Right Regulation under Farmland Control |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 吳珮瑛; 陳瑞主; | 書刊名 | 經社法制論叢 |
| 卷 期 | 33 2004.01[民93.01] |
| 頁 次 | 頁225-268 |
| 分類號 | 554.51 |
| 關鍵詞 | 農地外部效益; 財產權; 補償; 準徵收; 交易成本; External benefit of farmland; Property rights; Compensation; Taking; Transaction cost; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文逐一對臺灣有關農地使用管制法令的內容及精神作一檢視,由中歸納出土地使用管制的目的,並探討現行法規與制度在財產權界定方面之混淆與不足,以彌補過去文獻在探討農地外部效益之保障與產權界定之闕如。此外,透過財產權理論,檢討現行農地管制制度在產權界定上的缺失,並提出產權界定及補償機制所能發揮的補救功能。進而,以桃園縣觀音鄉農地砂石盜濫採事件,透過對此地區詳細的個案分析,深入了解如何藉產權之界定與保障,找出解決農地盜濫採砂石的問題。 由現行法令的檢討得知,相關法令對農地外部效益財產權,未能有明確的界定與有效的保障,是造成現今農地問題的重要根本原因之一。若透過管制方式限制了地主的使用權,在土地私有制度之下,可依據「準徵收」原則給予地主適當的產權損失補償。此外,在進行補償制度制定之時,必須做到「正名」的工作,才能讓民眾了解補償的理由,以助制度的推行。臺灣在農地農用管制制度下發生農地非法濫採砂石事件,事實上證明了政府採禁制法則管制農地外部效益,未必能達成保護資源的目標。在現行法律規定下,我們使用了一項似乎較「便宜」的方式保護農地資源,然而,在土地產權私有的體制下,這項管制已侵害了地主的使用權。我們期望藉由這樣的分析過程,能讓立法者及政策制定者能重視農地根本的產權問題。 |
| 英文摘要 | The purpose of this paper is to review and to realize the purposes of the laws related to current agricultural farmland regulation. And further it intends to clarify the inadequate constitution of the property rights for the external benefit of farmland embedded in those laws. It is understood that the unclear institution and protection for the property rights of external benefit of farmland creates the major problems of farmland utilization. Taking and compensation are approaches that can be used to compensate the landowner under farmland regulation. It, however, has to clearly identify the difference among compensation, subsidy, support, and reimbursement before the approaches implemented. It is also shown that under farmland regulation the purpose of protection of farmland resources may not be achieved. A relatively low-cost approach seems to be adopted in protecting the farmland resources. The impairment of property right for the farmland owner originates. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。