查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從比較戰略文化看戰爭與和平:以美國和中共為例=A Study on Peace and War from the Viewpoint of Comparative Strategic Culture: U.S. and P.R.C. |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 施正權; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷期 | 31:4=359 2004.04[民93.04] |
頁次 | 頁25-60 |
專輯 | 戰爭與和平專題 |
分類號 | 578.183 |
關鍵詞 | 戰略文化; 戰爭與和平; 比較戰略文化; 美國的戰爭觀; 中共的戰爭觀; 美國的和平觀; 中共的和平觀; Strategic culture; Comparative strategic culture; War and peace; U.S. warfare concept; U.S. peace concept; P.R.C. warfare concept; P.R.C. peace concept; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 戰爭與和平是人類永恆的議題,且充滿著弔詭的特質。在國際關係或戰略研究的領域中,都是一龐大的工程,難以定論其明確的起因;但就引爆戰爭的關鍵而論,決策者的認知(perception)是舉足輕重的,而錯誤的認知(misperception)更是具決定性。文化研究在一九七○年代被引進戰略研究領域,所形成的戰略文化途徑,為此一關鍵問題的解釋,提供了有效的分析架構,也使得對決策者的戰爭與和平的認知及選擇的規則性與可預測性之研究,更具實用性與可靠性。而在後九一一時代,最足以影響世界格局的美國與中共,兩國在何種認知下,形成她們的戰爭決定與和平建構之戰略選擇,則關係著人類未來安全的保障,殊值吾人注意。本文即藉由兩個戰略文化之比較,嘗試釐清其戰選擇的文化因子,同時指出,異文化的透澈了解,可能是避免戰爭,建構和平的真正關鍵之所在。 |
英文摘要 | Peace and War are the eternal issue with paradoxical characteristics of human beings. It is enormous task in the fields of international affairs or strategic studies. It's difficult to define the specific causes, but if discussing about the key point of the causes of wars, decision makers' perception in quite important. However, misperception is more influential. In 1970's, cultural studies were used to the field of studies. This strategic culture approach supports an effective analysis framework to the explanation of this key problem. It also makes the research on the principles and prediction of war and peace more pragmatic and reliable. This paper attempts to figure out their cultural factors for strategic alternatives through the comparison of their strategic culture. Meanwhile, the conclusion will show us that critical point for avoiding warfare and making peace is to realize the alien culture thoroughly. U.S. and P.R.C are most influential to world structure in the post-911 era; hence, their perception of warfare decision-making and peace construction is quite concerned with the future human security. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。