頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 近代西方法庭口供史料的運用與問題=Discussion on the "Trail" as the Documents on the Historical Works, Methods and Limited |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡米虹; | 書刊名 | 成大西洋史集刊 |
卷 期 | 11 2003.06[民92.06] |
頁 次 | 頁51-101 |
分類號 | 603 |
關鍵詞 | 口供; 宗教裁判所; 史料; 史學理論; Trial; Inquisition; Document; Court transcription; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文嘗試分析以「口供(trials)」作為史料的研究著作,探討研究者如何運用口供史料於問題研究上,並由此觀察口供史料運用於學術研究時可能產生的問題及其可行性。本文將就幾項問題進行剖析:首先,瞭解西方宗教裁判所審判制度的運作、審訊口供記錄的形成過程,討論口供做為史料的可行性。其次,分析學者利用口供史料的著作為例,剖析其對口供史料的運用方法。最後,再從口供史料本身與其運用時面臨的問題,評估口供史料用於學術研究上的局限性與發展性。 |
英文摘要 | This project attempts to analyze, examine the role of 'trial' played as the documents on the historical research, and try to observe how the other historian used the 'trial' on their research, some example about using trail records, the discussion about its' limits and questions. This paper will be divided into four sections as follows. The first section will show and analyze that the process of how the trail be formed, how the Inquisition played their roles when judging, how to performed the truth, and how to recorded the court transcripts. Is it possible that the trail became the historical source? Will it be too subjective or too objectivity? Is it true enough to reflect the real sense or living about the common people? Will it be any misunderstandings about the processes of trail-transferring the heresy's oral speaking to court transcript, parchment of Inquisition? Does it work to use trail as some sources in historical works? This is the main topic that the first section will be solved. The second section will describe that how to use trail to develop some researching programs. Based on role the 'trail' played as some important historical documents, the researching programs often focused on some witches, nun, peasants, heretic or Jaws, specially on margin people in the society. They were often a special group or individual in that country. Does the documents of trail have limited the researching direction or the scholars' view? The third section will analyze some examples of historical works; compare the differences between using trail sources and descriptive styles on the researching works. Their works with other different evidences broke the limit the trail required. The final section tries to examine both the advantages and limits by this way. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。