查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 「金剛般若波羅蜜經」玄義疏論=Metaphysics/Metaphor in Dhyana |
---|---|
作者 | 李霖生; | 書刊名 | 玄奘人文學報 |
卷期 | 1 2003.07[民92.07] |
頁次 | 頁175-190 |
分類號 | 221.44 |
關鍵詞 | 金剛般若波羅蜜經; 佛學研究; Metaphysics; Metaphor; Metonymy; Dhyana; Nihilism; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 一般人面對認知的困境,一種看似謙虛,其時傲慢的反應會飾以「此非主題所關之議題」規避之。例如文學領域之議論就飾辭曰「彼乃哲學議題,與我無干。」此輩乃以飾辭 (如哲學) 為避難所也。所謂傲慢,乃因此等言論隱責他人不能針對議題而有所論辯也。殊不知任何理論議題皆應追究其預設之正當性,若以此即為廣義之哲學議題,則宜其有議題之正當性也。另一類反應則更等而下之,即「若我不知你之所云,必是你不對。」「若我不諳汝之邏輯,必是汝不合邏輯。」學術論文固然宜力求論述之清礎明白,然而儘有學術論文。因其高明博愛而令人莫測高深。學者豈不聞「君子於其所不知,蓋闕如也。」彼輩強不知以為知,宜切記「多聞闕疑,慎言其餘」之訓。飾辭曰「讀之至再,不知所云」可謂巧言令色鮮矣仁,徒然暴露見識淺薄也。 |
英文摘要 | Metaphor requires the reader to do the work of constructing a long of categories and analogies. Metonymy accomplishes its transfer of meaning on the basis of associations that develop out of specific contexts rather than from participation in a structure of meaning. A metonymy dose not call for the magical sharing of meaning that a metaphor implies; instead, it relies on connections that build up over time and the associations of usage. Metonymy places us in the historical world of events and situations, whereas metaphor asserts connections on the basis of a deep logic that underlies any use of words. Even when there is no strongly figurative etymology, meaning is figurative in the sense that it relies on categories and associations. Language is thus not a simple process of naming preexisting objects and states but a system throught which we give meaning to the world. Now if language give meaning to experience, we have to think of it as the system which our idea become possible. Language is a conceptual grid, a system of values, through which we experience reality. Wisdom in dhyana describles its own metaphysics with the name “nihilism”and conceives it to be the counterstroke to all preceding metaphysics. The name nihilism thus loses the purely nihilistic sense in which it means a destruction and annihilation of previous values, the mere negation of beings and the futility of human history. Nihilism, thought in dhyana, call for freedom from values as freedom for a revaluation of all values. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。