查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從公序良俗原則看中國大陸的制度變遷=To Study an Institutional Transition of Chinese Mainland by Evaluating and Analyzing the Doctrine of Order Public and Morality |
---|---|
作 者 | 魏衍亮; 葉東蕾; | 書刊名 | 東吳法律學報 |
卷 期 | 15:1 2003.08[民92.08] |
頁 次 | 頁285-344 |
分類號 | 440.6 |
關鍵詞 | 生物技術; 可專利性; 公序良俗原則; 唯理主義; 經驗主義; 治理模式; 異議程序; 制訂法規範; 操作規範; Biotechnology; Patentability; The doctrine of ordre public and morality; Idealism; Empiricism; Institutional arrangements; Procedure of objection; Statutory regulations; Operating regulations; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文以總結、評析歐洲、中國大陸專利制度中的公序良俗原則為主審視了歐洲、中國大陸對生物技術可專利性的治理模式。這種審視表明唯理主義模式不符合中國大陸的利益需求。中國大陸近期可以參照日本的模式進行初步改革。從遠期看,它應當引進美國的經驗主義模式並完全摒棄歐洲的唯理主義模式。遠期改革需要中國大陸剔除規制生物技術可專利性的唯理主義規範,承認國家專利局復審委員會的復審先例在專利審查實踐中的約束力,承認法院裁判習慣的法律效力。 |
英文摘要 | The article studied the institutional arrangements to define patentable subject matter in the field of biotechnology by generalizing and analyzing the doctrine of ordre public and morality in Europe and Chinese Mainland. It displayed that idealistic arrangements wouldn't accord with utilitarian appeals of Chinese Mainland. In the short run, Chinese Mainland could reform its arranges according to institutional arrangements of Japan. However, it should abolish idealistic arrangements copied from Europe and use empirical ones of the U.S. as references in the long run. Such kinds of arrangements would ask for the abolishment of idealistic norms used to define patentable or unpatentable subject matter. China should also treat decisions of SIPO Board of Appeal as precedents that should be abided by patent examiners and the board itself. On the other hand, it would have to recognize the legal effect of judicial precedents. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。