查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 歐體與美國課征反傾銷與平衡稅決定之實證以及中國與臺灣的反傾銷控訴事件案例=The Empirics of AD/CVD Decisions in the E.C & U.S and a Demonstration of AD Indictment between China & Taiwan |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 林有志; | 書刊名 | 中州學報 |
卷期 | 17 2003.06[民92.06] |
頁次 | 頁113-129 |
分類號 | 558.2 |
關鍵詞 | 反傾銷稅; 平衡稅; 傾銷決定; 損害認定; 邏輯迴歸分析; Antidumping duty; Countervailing duty; Dumping decision; Injury determination; Logit regression analysis; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 近年來有許多GATT以至於目前的WTO會員國,依賴反傾銷的措施來作為保護性質易政策的擋箭牌。本文分成二部分,首先介紹文獻中利用計量方法以評估何種因素會影響傾銷案的成立,從本研究中可發現技術性或純經濟性因素會影響傾銷事實的認定,而損害認定則較受政治性因素所影響,由此可知將來要防止反傾銷措施被濫用則必須注意影響損害認定這部分其中的運作模式。雖然台灣與大陸加入世貿組織的時間不長而無法以統計方法來分析其中的反傾銷決定機制,但仍利用近來的案例,評估及預期將來雙方可能的處理模式,因此第二部分則由今年三月間,中國接連對台灣冷軋鋼品和聚氯乙烯提起反傾銷訴訟調查而成為兩岸入會後首次質易爭端為背景,以WTO中的機制分析雙方傾向的解決方式。從中可以得知中國希望以國內法的方式解決爭端,一方面可以解決兩岸間不平衡的貿易地位,另一方面又可維持一個中國的原則;台灣官方傾向以WTO機制解決問題,除統獨因素外,中國內部反傾銷調查機制設計與執行具瑕疵,將可能使台商難以獲得公平判決;而台灣民間則傾向和大陸業者私下協商,以求避開政治性干擾因素。 |
英文摘要 | In recent years, there has been a growing number of GATT (WTO) 's member countries rely on antidumping (AD) measures as a shield of protective trade policy. This paper is divided into two parts. First, we introduce how to use econometric analysis to evaluate the possible contributing reasons affecting the establishment of AD indictment by previous literature. From the results of logit regression analysis, we know that in E.C and U.S, the dumping decisions were affected almost by technical or economic variables while the political variables are more important in injury determinations. So, those who are interested in restraining the member countries to misuse of the AD provisions should concentrate their attention on the injury determination mechanism. The second part is an example of AD indictment of China toward Taiwan in order to understand and make expectation of possible process models of the future interactions. As we discussed, the government of China want to solve this problem by domestic law in order to maintain the balanced positions of trading and One China principle. In addition to the problem of nation's orientation and unfair treatment of Taiwan's merchant from China because of imperfect law, the authority of Taiwan was intended to handle this dispute by WTO's mechanism. The popular of Taiwan have the tendency to negotiate privately with their opponent in order to avoid the political disturbances. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。