查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 我國大法官會議與政治問題之研究--以美國憲政經驗為例=Judicial Review of Political Controversies in the Council of Grand Justice in Taiwan as Compared with the US Supreme Court |
---|---|
作 者 | 林正順; 陳龍騰; | 書刊名 | 正修通識教育學報 |
卷 期 | 1 2004.06[民93.06] |
頁 次 | 頁155-180 |
分類號 | 589.1 |
關鍵詞 | 司法審查; 政治問題; 權力分立; 去政治化; Judicial review; Political controversy; Separation of power; Depoliticization; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文探討之核心為我國司法審查制度如何處理有關政治問題的方式與範圍,而研究的方法則是經由比較法之分析,試圖尋求我國較佳的處理模式與凖據。本文共分為四個部分,首先介紹我國司法審查制度的主要內容,以了解大法官處理政治問題所引發的相關問題。接著探討美國聯邦最高法院關於政治問題的理論與實務經驗,以作為參考借鏡。並從制度及實務兩方面,分析比較我國與美國之間的差異及其原因,最後則以如何使司法審查不受政治的影響為討論重點,並提出若干建議。本文觀點認為基於「權力分立」原則,司法權應有其界限與範圍;惟為發揮「憲法守護神」的功能,司法權又應積極面對政治問題,以解決憲政糾紛。職是之故,司法審查政治問題的較佳模式應從建構其「程序審」與「實體審」兩方面做起,並使其相互間達到相輔相成之效果。 |
英文摘要 | Judicial review of political controversies in Taiwan has generated a great deal of discussion recently. The issue should be examined closely and hopefully a general model of practice may be achieved by learning from the experiences of functions of the US Supreme Court. The differences and similarities of the two systems will be studied in this paper so as to reinforce our belief that the judicial force should be independent from political influences. The principle of separation of power should safeguards the law and maintains the dignity of the constitution. As a result, judicial review of political controversies should not only observe the justice of procedure but also examine facts and evidences so that the judicial power can be independent from political interferences. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。