頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 臺灣地區的中國近現代史研究--以學術期刊與博碩士論文為分析對象(1945-2000)=The Trend in the Study of Modern Chinese History in Taiwan--A Quantitative Analysis of Journal Papers, Theses and Dissertation(1945-2000) |
---|---|
作 者 | 彭明輝; 唐志宏; | 書刊名 | 國立政治大學歷史學報 |
卷 期 | 20 2003.05[民92.05] |
頁 次 | 頁375-425 |
分類號 | 628 |
關鍵詞 | 臺灣地區; 中國近現代史; 專史分類; 博碩士論文; 期刊論文; Taiwan; Modern Chinese history; Topical history classification; Thesis; Journal monograph; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 一般學者對臺灣地區的中國近現代史研究,其粗略印象約為研究者人數眾多,占歷史學研究比例甚高,但究竟高到什麼程度,其內容如何,仍待進一步分析。本文以1945-2000年間,臺灣地區歷史研究所博碩士論文,及8種曾經刊行或目前仍在刊行的歷史學期刊論文為分析母體,分析中國近現代史研究的動向。在討論過程中一面分析中國近現代史研究的時代線性趨勢,一面討論專史分類的分布,同時亦與整體本國史研究的專史分類進行比較。 以本文的5個分期而言,中國近現代史同為博碩士論文與期刊論文占比例最高的本國斷代史,惟博碩士論文的中國近現代史研究在每個時期都高於期刊論文,但到第5期時兩者的中國近現代史研究己漸趨一致;在蒐集到的627篇中國近現代史博碩士論文中,專史分類比例依序為:(一)政治軍事史占27.4%,(二)思想文化史16.3%,(三)國際關係15.6%,(四)社會史14.5%,(五)經濟史13.2%,(六)教育4.5%;其他專史所占比例均在3.0%以下,比例最低的5類是:(一)制度史0.3%,(二)科技史0.5%,(三)圖書史0.5%,(四)藝術史1.0%,(五)史學相關論題1.9%o在蒐集到的1,010篇中國近現代史期刊論文中,專史分類比例依序為:(一)思想文化史占30.8%,(二)政治軍事史占28.2%,(三)史學相關論題10.0%,(四)國際關係史8.7%,(五)經濟史8.7%,(六)社會史5.9%;其他專史所占比例均在3.0%以下,比例最低的5類是:(一)婦女史0.5%,(二)藝術史0.6%,(三)科技史0.6%,(四)圖書史0.6%,(五)宗教史1.3%。 |
英文摘要 | Although it has been widely acknowledged that quite a high percentage of historical works in Taiwan contributed to the field of modern Chinese history, such understanding remains impressionistic. This paper gives a quantitative analysis in how such academic trend has emerged and changed over the years. The authors examines eight major historical journals, M.A. theses, and dissertations finished between 1945 and 2000 to see how the research trend has shifted during this period. The paper will, on the one hand, concentrate on describing the phenomenon in the field. It will also, on the other, analyze the distribution of works in each sub -field, e.g., economic history, political history, social history, etc. to compare with works in Chinese history as a whole. The period between 1945 and 2000 can be divided into five time span s. In each of the five studies of modern Chinese history possesses the highest percentage among works in Chinese history. Moreover, there are more theses and dissertations than journal papers contributed to this field. By the fifth time span, however, the percentage of theses and dissertations contributed to modern Chinese history is close to that of journal papers. Of 627 theses and dissertations in this field 27.4% works on political and military history, 16.3% intellectual and cultural history, 15.6% international relationship, 14.5% social history, 13.2% economic history, 4.5% educational history, and less than 3% unidentifiable. The lowest percentage among the field are: institutional history (0.3%), history of science (0.5%), history of books (0.5%), art history (1.0%), historiography (1.9%). Of 1,010 journal papers on modern Chinese history, intellectual and cultural history possesses 30.8% of works, political and military history 28.2%, historiography 10.0%, international relationship 8.7%, economic history 8.7%, and social history 5.9%, unidentifiable less than 3.0%. The lowest percentage in the field are: history of women 0.5%, art history 0.6%, history of science (0.6%), history of books (0.6%), history of religion 1.3%. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。