查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 花蓮縣風險性駕駛肇事之交通事故分析=Traffic Accidents Caused by Hazardous Driving in Hualien County |
---|---|
作 者 | 李燕鳴; | 書刊名 | 慈濟醫學 |
卷 期 | 15:3 2003.06[民92.06] |
頁 次 | 頁175-183 |
分類號 | 412.41 |
關鍵詞 | 超速; 酒後駕駛; 風險性駕駛; 機動車事故傷害; 花蓮縣; Speedy driving; Driving under the influence of alcohol; Hazardous driving behavior; Motor vehicle injuries; Hualien county; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 目的:分析花蓮縣風險性駕駛之交通事故的相關狀況。材料與方法:以衛生署88年、89年死亡資料檔和警政署之交通肇事記錄,計算花蓮縣鄉鎮市機動車事故的平均死亡率,分析酒後和超速肇事事故的比例及相關狀況。結果:發現花蓮地區機動交通事故粗死亡率(46.7/10[fec3])高出約2倍,區域中以山地鄉最高(79.5/10[fec3])和死亡者年齡最低(平均年齡40.4歲)。二年期間全縣共有1,275宗交通事故,肇事原因18.3%是超速和18.5%是酒後(醉)駕駛,其中以山地鄉酒後駕駛的比例最高(40.0%)。1,424位機車騎士中有12.1%未戴安全帽、950位四輪車之駕駛人中81.2%是未繫安全帶,超速和酒後事故當事人都是駕駛人,酒後肇事者的58.8%超出法規取締標準(吹氣酒精濃度>0.25 ㎎/L),7.5%為明顯酒醉,40.8%未繫安全帶(帽);超速事故肇事者也有6.5%是酒後駕駛,43.5%未繫安全帶(帽);死傷狀況以超速事故最為嚴重。酒後、超速和其他人為過失違規事故於車種、車故類型、發生時間有顯著差異。當事人於性別、年齡、教育程度、職業和受傷狀況也有顯著差異。結論:酒後及超速駕駛在花蓮地區是重要的交通肇事原因,但從交通記錄評估相關傷亡可能嚴重低估,故建議急診醫療協助飲酒相關事故的評析,另加強山地鄉安全駕駛對事故傷害防治尤其重要。 |
英文摘要 | Objectives: To investigate traffic accidents caused by hazardous driving. Materials and Methods: Records of registered deaths from the Department of Health and traffic accident records from the Department of Transportation (1999-2000) were analyzed in this study. The average mortality from motor vehicle injuries in various districts, the proportions of drivers who were speedy, and the proportion of drivers who were under the influence of alcohol were assessed. Results: The mortality from motor vehicle injuries in Hualien County (46.7 per 10[fec3] population) was twice that of Taiwan as a whole (23.2 per 10[fec3] population) in 2000. The highest mortality (79.5 per 10[fec3] population) was found in the aboriginal community. In addition, the age at death was lowest in the aboriginal community (average 40.4 years old). There were 1275 traffic accidents in 1999-2000; 18.5% were due to driving under the influence of alcohol (DUA) and 18.3% were due to speeding. The proportion of DUA was high in the aboriginal community. Of the 1424 motorcyclists involved in accidents, 12.1%were not wearing a helmet. Of 950 drivers of four-wheeled vehicles, 81.2% were not using a seatbelt. Of drivers who were DUA, 58.8% had levels of alcohol higer than the regulation limit (breath alcohol test>0.25 mg/L), 7.5% was ‘drunk' and 40.8% were not wearing a seatbelt or helmet. Among drivers who were speeding, 6.5% were DUA, and 43.5% were not wearing a seatbelt or helmet. Deaths and injuries were most severe in accidents caused by speeding. There were significant differences between vehicles, patterns of collisions, and timing in accidents caused by speeding or driving under the influence of alcohol. The drivers' gender, age, education, occupation, and injuries between hazardous driving were significantly different. Conclusions: Speeding and driving under the influence of alcohol were important causes of accidents. The estimation of alcohol related injuries from police records might be low. The emergency room may be an ideal location for screening and monitoring alcohol related motor-vehicle injuries. Furthermore, promoting safe driving in the aboriginal community is crucial in preventing traffic accidents caused by hazardous driving. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。