查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Prospective and Randomized Trial of Intravenous Tenoxicam Versus Fentanyl and Tramadol for Analgesia in Outpatient Extracorporeal Lithotripsy
- The Analgesic Effect of Oral Morphine or Pentazocine for Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
- Antegrade Ureterorenoscopic Manipulation of Upper Ureteral Stones
- Intrathecal Opioids Provide Satisfactory Conditions in Labor Analgesia and Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section
- 是毒?是藥?--嗎啡類止痛藥
- The Experience of Second Generation Lithotriptor for Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Calculi in Children
- 臺灣地區十年來阿片類止痛藥使用趨勢之探討
- Comparison of PCA Nalbuphine and Morphine in Chinese Gynecologic Patients
- A Comparison of Lidocaine, Fentanyl, and Esmolol for Attenuation of Cardiovascular Response to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation
- 術前及術中經硬脊膜外腔注射嗎啡對椎間板切除術有良好之術後止痛效果
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | The Analgesic Effect of Oral Morphine or Pentazocine for Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy=以口服Morphine或Pentazocine作體外震波碎石術麻醉之止痛效果 |
---|---|
作 者 | 韓吟宜; 呂學嘉; 蔡欣容; 許淑霞; 陳國瀚; 蔡勝國; | 書刊名 | 麻醉學雜誌 |
卷 期 | 41:1 2003.03[民92.03] |
頁 次 | 頁27-32 |
分類號 | 416.5 |
關鍵詞 | 嗎啡; 碎石術; Morphine; Pentazocine; Lithotripsy; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 背景:由於震波碎石術所使用之機型改良後,震波對人體造成之疼痛大為減輕, 麻醉止痛之方式也因而不再侷限於傳統之全身麻醉,硬膜外腔麻醉或靜脈麻醉等。因此使得 適當的口服止痛且併發較少的副作用成為必要考量。 方法:我們選擇 100 位因泌尿道結石 須接受體外震波碎石術 (ESWL) 之病人,任意區分為二組,每組各 50 人,分別給予不同之 口服止痛劑加上鎮靜劑 (lorazepam 1 mg),觀察這二種口服止痛劑之效果及其副作用, 並 記錄血流動力及血氧之變化。 本實驗病人所使用碎石機之機型為 Dornier HM3 改良型。口 服止痛劑分別為 morphine 30 mg, 及 pentazocine 100 mg, 均與 lorazepam 1 mg 溶於 15 ml 之開水中,於手術前 30 分鐘分別給各組病人服下,並於各選定時段觀察並記錄相關 指標,若病人不堪疼痛,則追加靜注 fentanly 使手術繼續進行。結果:結果顯示,二組病 人中,接受 pentazocine 100 mg 為口服止痛劑的病人, 有 94% 能順利完成手術,不須追 加任何靜注止痛劑,且其止痛程度 --pain,sedation 及 efficacy scale 之指數均令人滿 意,在碎石過程中,病人之嗜睡反應也較理想,但眩暈之副作用,此組病人則呈現較高之比 率。 而接受 morphine 30 mg 的病人則 68% 之病人可以不需追加靜注止痛劑而完成手術, 但噁心嘔吐副作用比例較高。 血壓變化組內與組間均無差異,但給予 pentazocine 此組有 較高心跳和較低血氧飽和度之變化,但臨床上對病人均未產生明顯之症狀或需要加以處理。 結論:我們認為對震波碎石之止痛麻醉方式,若考慮成本效益及避免靜注麻醉劑過量之風險 , 單一口服止痛劑 pentazocine 100 mg 加上鎮靜劑 lorazepam 1 mg,可以提供以新型高 科技碎石機進行震波碎石術病人滿意之止痛效果。 |
英文摘要 | Background:Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in these days is usually carried out on ambulatory or outpatient basis. With the application of a lithotriptor of modern version an appropriate yet cost-effective analgesia with minimal side effects for ESWL is mandatory. Methods:The analgesic effect of oral morphine (30 mg) was compared with that of pentazocine (100 mg) in a prospective study comprising 100 patients undergoing ESWL with a lithotripter of improved version for urinary tract stones. All patients received orally lorazepam 1 mg as sedative together with the appointed tested drug 30 min before the procedure. The analgesic effects of both drugs were assessed having recourse to the pain scale and efficacy scale. Results:There were 94% of patients in the pentazocine (mixed agonist-antagonist)group who felt satisfied with the regimen and stood the procedure well without resort to supplemental drug, as compared with the morphine (potent μ -agonist)group in which only 70% of patients did so. Although the adverse effect such as dizziness was found in the pentazocine group, the degree of sleepiness produced by its deeper sedation effect was to the advantage of patients during the lithotripsy procedure. There were no significant changes in intergroup mean blood pressure (MBP), but heart rate (HR) was higher and O �� saturation (SpO �� )was lower in the pentazocine group after treatment. Both narcotics did not induce renal colic in our study. Also, pentazocine 100 mg plus lorazepam 1 mg given orally did not induce psychotomimetic reaction intraoperatively or postoperatively. Conclusions:We concluded that oral pentazocine at 100 mg plus lorazepam 1 mg, could offer satisfactory analgesia in patients undergoing ESWL for urinary tract stones with a lithotripter of improved version. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。