查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 萬有起源的形上構思--試由東、西方幾個事例談起=The Metaphysical Conception about the Beginning of All Things--Some Examples from Both the East and the West |
---|---|
作者 | 陳俊輝; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷期 | 30:2=345 2003.02[民92.02] |
頁次 | 頁53-70 |
專輯 | 形上學專題 |
分類號 | 163.1 |
關鍵詞 | 神明; 天; 道; 耶威; 神; 造物主; 大霹靂; 生機; 活力; 啟示; 類比; 位格; The divine; Tien; Tao; Yahweh; God; The big bang; Vitality; Revelation; Analogy; Person; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 拙文係從五個事例作起始,以探討「什麼是萬有的起源?」 這一論題。這五個事例,分別是: 一、中國孔子對「天」的思想。 二、中國老予對「道」的構思。 三、古希臘哲人對「神明」的設定。 四、古希伯萊人對「耶威」(神)的認定。 五、現代科學大霹靂說對「造物主」的預設。 接而,即提出綜合整理;並且主張:萬有或宇宙的存在,確實是有它的起源。至於促使萬有有其起源的背後之動力,應當是:那具有生機(活力)、智慧,以及富涵多種德性的「終極實在(者)」。 我們世人(尤其前述五事例中的當事者),乃至有學者提出的學理(如:大霹靂理論),便是以類比、擬人化或位格性的認知角度,去詮解此一「終極實在」;結果,便有上述的「天」、「道」、「神明」與「造物主」......等稱號的出現。其實,依筆者之淺見,即從前述的論點──認定:「終極實在」,當是擁有生機(活力),智慧......等特性──來看,他們應多在喻指同一位造物主、同一位(真)神,或同一位萬有的存在根基;可以用「眾存有者的基源」來形容祂(而非「它」)。因為,祂確實是眾生命的來源,也是諸無生命事物之被造生的本源。 |
英文摘要 | This paper starts the discussion about the beginning of all things through five examples, first, Confucian's idea about “Tien,” second, Laotzu's concept of Tao, third, the ancient Greek philosophers' definition of the “divine,” and fourth, the ancient Hebrews' thought about Yaweh, and fifth, modern science's assumption of the Big Bang. Then we generalize all the ideas and claim that the existence of the universe or of all things has indeed its source. As for the power that mediate the source of all things, it should be vitality, wisdom, and the ultimate substance that possess multiple virtues. People on earth, especially those involved in the five examples and even the scholars who bring out the theories (like the Big Bang) actually interpret such an ultimate substance form a analogical and personified, personal perspective. Consequently, they come up with terms like “Tien,” “Dao,” “God,” the “Creator” and so on. Actually, the writer believes that the ultimate substance should characterized by features like vitality, wisdom and accordingly claims that all these point the same creator, the same (true) god or the same existential foundation of 萬有. “He” rather than “It” can be referred to as the source of all beings, while He is indeed the source of all life and the source of non-living matters. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。