頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 專利法上之先發明主義與先申請主義=First-to-Invent vs. First-to-File under the Patent Law |
---|---|
作者 | 許雅雯; Hsu, Ya-wen; |
期刊 | 智慧財產權月刊 |
出版日期 | 20030200 |
卷期 | 50 2003.02[民92.02] |
頁次 | 頁37-58 |
分類號 | 408.8 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 先發明主義; 先申請主義; 首先完成發明者; 專利調和化; First to invent; First to file; The first and true inventor; Patent harmonization; |
中文摘要 | 決定專利權優先取得的方式,分成先發明主義與先申請主義。前者以發明之先後,為准否專利之取得:後者則以申請之先後,以決定專利之取得。然不同於世界各國,美國採行先發明主義。先申請主義以著重其交易穩定性、獎勵技術公開,以保護真正發明人。然先發明主義之立法目的則在於維護公平性、獎勵技術研發,賦予專利於首先完成發明者。故兩者各有其優缺點,為提升國際競爭力,促使產業革新,探究兩套制度之利弊得失,實為重大議題。 |
英文摘要 | First-to-invent and first-to-file are the two major systems determining priority of patent right. First-to-invent grants the patent to the person who is the true and first inventor; and, first-to-file grants patent on the basis of the earliest effective filing date of a patent application. The US patent system may be the only nation adopts first-to-invent system. The aim of First-to-File system is to protect the true inventor and the economic safely, then promoting the publication of patent invention. On the other hand, the aim of the US system is to maintain fair-trade system and encourage inventors to research and develop technique. There are advantages and disadvantages in these two systems. In order to promote competition throughout the world and the industry innovation, it is more than important to balance the benefits of the two systems. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。