查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- The Aftermath of Civil War: A New Perspective on Vespasian and the British Legions
- 吉朋[Edward Gibbon]「羅馬帝國衰亡史」
- 國語羅馬字拼音與注音符號第二式
- 古代羅馬的公共澡堂
- The Canterbury Election of 1205-06 in England in Historical Perspective
- 小學實施羅馬拼音教學之個案研究--兼論其與英語教育之相關性
- 教父論洗禮的象徵意義--從羅馬人書六 3-11談起
- 中國儒、道二家與古西方希伯來、希臘、羅馬的社會福利思想
- 共黨統治下的大規模反抗運動與共黨的預防策略--理論探討
- 《日耳曼紀》導論與中譯
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | The Aftermath of Civil War: A New Perspective on Vespasian and the British Legions |
---|---|
作者 | Berriman,Andrew; | 書刊名 | 輔仁歷史學報 |
卷期 | 13 2002.06[民91.06] |
頁次 | 頁223-248 |
分類號 | 740.22 |
關鍵詞 | 羅馬; 惠斯帕西安; 羅馬軍隊; 羅馬不列顛; 羅馬內戰; 阿格利可拉; Rome; Vespasian; Roman army; Roman Britain; Civil war; Agricola; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 傳統上咸認爲西元七十年左右在不列顛所發生的羅馬軍事行動,主要是兩個事件所形成的後果,一爲Brigantes的羅馬王后Cartimandua落敗,一爲西元六十九年所發生的羅馬內戰。在這篇論文中,作者不完全同意上述的看法,而認爲從另外兩個觀點來看在不列顛的羅馬軍事行動會更爲正確。其一是沿羅馬帝國的萊茵河邊境所發動的戰役;其二是因Vespasian大帝的某些軍團在過去爲其對手Vitellius麾下部屬,故Vespasian需要考驗此軍隊對他是否忠誠。文中亦論及,由於軍隊中存在著有意圖謀反的潛在因素,所以Vespasian爲避免未來可能發生的內戰,因此發動戰爭來保護他自身的權力,進而爭取部隊對他的效忠,這解釋了他在大不列顛發動戰爭的意圖,和爲何這場戰爭持續如此長的時間,也說明了影響選擇那些部隊駐紮在特定軍事基地的主要原因。 |
英文摘要 | Armenia was a region of great strategic importance to the Roman Empire, and in the early years of the principate, it was usually ruled by client-kings of Rome. In 51 AD, its client-king, Mithridates was murdered and the usurper was ultimately ejected by the Parthians, who set up their own nominee, A long period of instability in the region followed. Claudius, the Roman Emperor in 51, has been largely blamed by the Roman historian, Tacitus, and by modern scholarship following him, for allowing this to happen. It is the aim of this paper to show that Claudius actually handled this crisis a lot better than he has been given credit for and that historians have been too incautious and unquestioning, not so much in accepting the facts as Tacitus set them out, but in adopting his opinion of this crisis. If the approach presented here is accepted, repercussions could be felt not only in our perceptions of this major historical event, but also in modern historians' views of the capabilities of the emperor Claudius and in a more questioning acceptance o the opinions of so important a historical source as Tacitus. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。