查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 政策次級系統與政策典範--政策變遷之模型建構=Policy Subsystem and Policy Paradigm: A Model Setting for Policy Change |
---|---|
作 者 | 孫煒; | 書刊名 | 政治學報 |
卷 期 | 34 2002.12[民91.12] |
頁 次 | 頁123-148 |
分類號 | 573.07 |
關鍵詞 | 政策次級系統; 政策變遷; 政策網絡; 政策社群; 政策終結; 政策接繼; Policy subsystem; Policy change; Policy network; Policy community; Policy termination; Policy succession; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 公元二千年的政黨輪替是我國遷臺半紀以未有之變局,不但在實際政務上是對國民黨政府長期主政時代所推動公共政策的重大衝擊,在學術研究上也是觀察檢視政策科學相關概念與理論的最佳契機。本論文的研究目的即採取當前政策科學的後實証觀點建構一個政策變遷模型,在此模型中結合後實証觀點的重要研究成果,如政策次級系統與政策典範等,企圖描述民進黨政府執政以來重大公政策,如政策次級系統與政策典範等,企圖描述民進黨政府執政以來重大公共政策的變遷、解類此種變遷的原因,並預測其政策變遷的發展趨勢。為達成本論文的研究目的,本論首先 先分析政策次級系統的概念,除探討政策次級 系統的意涵,並釐清兩種政策次級系統的類型-政策社群與政策網絡-之間的關係。其次、分析政策典範的概念,利用科學社群典範轉移的意涵與理論,探討政策典範轉移的過程與特徵。之後,結合以上政策次級系統與政策典範的概念分析,將政策變遷區分為涉及典範轉移的政策終結與漸水調整的政策接繼兩種類型,並佐以政策社群與政策網絡的一致程度,建構一個以政策典範為導向的政策變遷模型,並分別探討此模型中各項要素的意義與其間的關係。最後,配合以上政策變遷模型中各項要素的特徵,略舉民進黨政府執政以來四項重大政策變遷的個案-大陸經貿政策、核四停建計畫、高等教育政策、高鐵計畫-以印証本模型中基本假設與理論要點。 |
英文摘要 | The shift in the ruling political part in 2000 was an unprecedented change in the political climate since the ROC migrated to Taiwan. Such crossroad is not only an upheaval on the public policies of the extensive administration by the KMT, but also an opportune tie to observe the concepts and theories of policy sciences on the academic front. The goal of this thesis is to adopt the current postpositive view of policy sciences, using the various interactive modes between the policy subsystems since the take over by the DPP, to explain the reasons behind such changes, as well as to build models to forecast the trends of its policy change. To achieve such research goals, the following logic is adopted: First analyze the concepts of the policy subsystem; besides examining the implications of the policy subsystems, one clarifies the categories of such subsystems the interrelations between policy community and policy networks. Next analyze the concept of policy paradigm by using the implications and concepts of paradigmatic shift of scientific community to classify policy paradigm into policy termination involving paradigmatic shift and policy succession via incremental adjustment. Then combine the above policy subsystem with and the categorization analysis of policy paradigm to build a opolicy-paradigam0-centered policy shift model, and individually analyze the significance and interrelations between the various key factors. Finally, in line with the characteristics of such key policy change, suing the case studies of the four major policy changes adopted since the DPP take-over which serve to validate the empirical significance of the basic hypothesis an and theoretical essence in the model. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。