查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 我加入WTO的政經衝擊?--兩岸政策與法律配套之檢討
- 我加入世界貿易組織(WTO)開放法律服務業市場簡介
- 加入世貿對中共的政經衝擊
- 加入WTO對兩岸金融往來之探討
- China's Telecom Regulatory Regime on the Eve of WTO Accession
- 世界貿易組織協定在我國法律上之地位
- 我國加入世貿組織租稅法律修正案剖析
- 美國利用國際經貿活動推展勞動人權之研究
- Alexy對Radbruch之惡法判斷公式的辯護
- Foreign Investment in Perspective: The Road from Bretton Woods to Marrakesh
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 我加入WTO的政經衝擊?--兩岸政策與法律配套之檢討=Our Economical Shock of Entrance to WTO: Review of Cross Strait Policy and Law Set |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 張五岳; 翁挺育; | 書刊名 | 政治學報 |
卷期 | 34 2002.12[民91.12] |
頁次 | 頁61-96 |
分類號 | 553.01 |
關鍵詞 | 世界貿易組織; 法律; 兩岸政策; 政經; WTO; Cross-Strait relations; Taiwan and China region people relation regulation; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 在臺灣經濾正處變遷與轉型陣痛中,各界無不殷盼藉由進一步推動兩岸經貿交流,以共創雙贏,中國大陸與臺灣,分別在2001年12月11日、2002年1日1日正式成為WTO會員。 就兩岸關係而言,臺灣加入WTO後所衍生的市場政經濟勢的轉變,以及兩岸經貿政策的調整,對將我廠商營運與大陸投資活動,產生一定之影響。同理可推,大陸加WTO,相關外貿與外政政策、法規與措施的調整,除將造民間私人企業在大陸市場經營佈局的改變外,也將直、間接影響我政府與法律的妥當性,因此有必要瞭解我加入WTO後對於未來兩岸政策與法律架構應如何調整之。 本論文將區皆為五部分,第一部分前言,第二部分述及經發會共識政策宣示落實的法制基礎,第三部皆計對現行兩岸人民關?條例與經貿政策作一檢視,第四部分中國大陸學者對兩岸加入WTO之看法,最後第五部分結論。 「臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例」為現行我方政府規範兩岸人民往返互經貿交流的母法;且係我方政單位邊立法(未與大陸進行協商)屬委任立法(法律條文大多授權行政機關訂定許可辦法)。故在兩岸法律無法競合下,以及司法管轄權爭議的現實層面,難以發揮其應有功能。究竟在現行兩岸人民關係條例規定下,我方應如格持續性地修正相關法律條文,以因應兩岸經貿之需求?本文將進一步體檢現行兩岸人民關係條例暨經發會共識對兩岸經貿之具體規範之利弊評估以及建議,兼論及中國大陸學者對兩岸入世的看法,最後提出建議修正條文草案。 |
英文摘要 | As Taiwan’s economy is in transition and transformation, all expect to promote cross strait economical exchange to reach two win, china and Taiwan became respectively WTO’s member on December 11th, 2001 and January 1st, 2002. Regarding cross strait relations, the deriving transition of market, political and economical situation after Taiwan’s entrance into WTO and the regulation of cross strait policy will effect our factory operation and investment in China. Same as China’s entrance into WTO, the regulation of relative international trade and foreign investment policy, laws and measures will not only change private enterprises’ management in China but also affect our government policy and propriety, thus, it’s necessary to know how future cross strait policy and law structure regulate after our entrance into WTO. This report cam be divided in 5 parts, the first part is preface, the description of Economic Development Advisory’s common consensus and declaration of fulfilled legal institutions basis, the third part is review of current cross strait people relation regulation and economic policy, the forth part is Chinese scholars’ viewpoints toward Taiwan and China’s entrance to WTO, the last part is the conclusion. “Taiwan and China region people relation regulation” is the mother law of our current standard regarding cross strait communication and economic exchange, moreover, since our lateral government legislation (no negotiation with China) belongs to designated legislation (law article authorizes administrative institutions to establish their laws). Therefore cross strait laws can’t function well due to the incompatibility of cross strait laws and the dispute of judiciary exercise control. How should we revise continuously relative law articles to meet the needs of cross strait economical development under current cross strait people relation regulation? This article will review current cross strait relation regulation and Economic Development Advisory consensus’ evaluation of advantages and disadvantages and suggestions concerning cross strait’s concrete standards, and also discus Mainland China’s scholars viewpoints of Taiwan and China’s entrance to WTO, and finally propose suggested revised article draft. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。