頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國際創造力教育發展的趨勢=International Trends in Creativity Education |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳靜吉; 林偉文; 林士郁; 陳秋秀; 曾敬梅; 王涵儀; 徐悅淇; | 書刊名 | 資優教育研究 |
卷 期 | 2:1 2002.06[民91.06] |
頁 次 | 頁1-25 |
分類號 | 521.422 |
關鍵詞 | 創造力教育; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
英文摘要 | To create the "Republic of Creativity, ROC" as its vision for creativity education, the Ministry of Education commissioned the first author to conduct a research project to understand the international trends in creativity education. Thirteen countries and one special area were included in this study. They were the U.S.A., U.K., France, Italy, Germany and Holland from the developed countries in the West; China, H.K., Singapore, Japan and South Korea from the so-called collective societies in Asia; and Canada, Australia and New Zealand from English speaking countries of the Pacific basin that were not included in the first two groups. To collect, analyze, classify and interpret the data, a framework was created which consisted of the following four components: (1)government' s policies, strategies and leaders' claims; (2) universities and research institutes' efforts in research and development, (3) the private sectors' promotion and action plans, and (4) creative culture. The following methods were employed to collect data: (1) identification of 330 websites on the Internet, (2) literature reviews, (3) interviews with foreign experts in creativity and foreign government representatives in Taiwan. (4) solicitation of responses from researchers in creativity; (5) discussion panels composed of college professors who obtained their doctoral degrees in various fields and countries; and (6) an open-ended questionnaire survey sent to 52 worldwide Fulbright Foundations. The results showed that practically every government and its leaders formally or informally emphasized the importance of fostering creativity, despite the fact that no single nation had published a white paper on creativity. However, the Asian central governments made special efforts to promote creativity, mostly in words, with some actions taken. The universities and private sectors in the U.S. are more active in research, education and promotion of creativity than those in other countries. What Singapore aimed at-" foster creativity and innovation as a way of life" - has been realized in France and maybe in other European nations. The Australian National Innovation Summit made 24 recommendations to (1)create a creative culture, (2)generate ideas, and (3)carry out ideas. The British NACCCE published a report entitled: "All our Futures: Creativity, Culture and Education." All of these did offer many good ideas and action plans for the Ministry of Education's "White Paper on Creativity Education." They were reflected in the principles, strategies and immediate and long-term plans to create and realize the vision of the "Republic of Creativity, ROC. " |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。