查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 以五種疼痛評估量表探討手術後病童之疼痛程度
- 探討手術後病人對疼痛護理及疼痛控制的滿意度及其影響因素
- 脊椎手術後疼痛控制--必要時每四小時靜脈滴注Demerol之效果探討
- 探討不同給藥方式對脊椎手術病患疼痛控制之成效
- 手術後兒童對疼痛的因應策略
- Comparison of Local Infiltration of Tenoxicam and Intravenous Tenoxicam for Postoperative Analgesia in Herniorrhaphy
- 比較使用及未使用「手術後疼痛評估表」之上腹部手術患者對手術後疼痛護理的評價
- 評估兒童手術後的疼痛感受及疼痛反應
- 手術全期兒童疼痛的評估與處理
- A Clinical Audit for Postoperative Pain Control on 1443 Surgical Patients
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 以五種疼痛評估量表探討手術後病童之疼痛程度=Comparison of Scales Assessing Post-Operative Pain in Children |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳幸娟; 陳秀蓉; | 書刊名 | 慈濟醫學 |
卷 期 | 14:5 2002.10[民91.10] |
頁 次 | 頁311-315 |
分類號 | 419.75 |
關鍵詞 | 手術後疼痛; 疼痛評估量表; 兒童疼痛; Post-operative pain; Pain assessment scales; Child's Pian; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 目的:本研究為瞭解學齡期病童手術後之主觀性疼痛感受,運用5種疼痛評估量表探討病童的疼痛程度。病人與方法:研究對象為在中部某醫學中心兒科病房25位6~13歲接受手術的病童,在術後每隔四小時利用5個量表,收集4次痛童疼痛程度之評估。5個疼痛量表分別是:視覺類比量表(Visual Analogue Scale: VAS)、10cm量表(Numerical Scale)、杯子量表(Glasses Scale),臉譜量表(Face Rating Scale)及描述詞量表(Words Descriptive Scale)。結果:研究所得資料以SPSS 8.0 for Windows 進行統計分析,結果如下:(1)四次視覺類比量表平均值自35.1mm~59.2mm;10cm量表四次平均值為3.5cm~5.9cm;臉譜量表所得資料前三次最多是第3個臉譜(更多些不舒服),第四次則為第2個臉譜(有些不舒服);杯子量表前2次最多是第3個杯子及後兩次是第2個杯子;描述詞量表四次中最多病童表示為一點點痛;(2)病童最喜歡使用的是臉譜量表,其次是視覺類比量表與杯子量表;(3)病童認為最容易表達其?痛感受的是臉譜量表,其次是杯子量表;(4)視覺類比量表與10cm量表所得資料具顯著相關性(p<0.001),杯子量表與臉譜量表所得資料亦具顯著相關性(p<0.001)。結論:本研究證實同時以多種評估量表,可更客觀的瞭解手術後病童的疼痛感受,建議於兒科各種治療情境中,多運用臉譜量表協助病童表達其感覺。本研究結果可建立本土化資料,亦可作為兒科護理教學及臨床護理實務應用。 |
英文摘要 | Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess post-operative pain in children with several assessment scales. Patients and Methods: Twenty-five patients between 6 and 13 years old were evaluated in one hospital in Taichung. The pain assessment scales included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numerical Scale, Face Rating Scale, Glasses Scale and Words Descriptive Scale. Results: Using SPSS for Windows 8.0, we analyzed the collected data four times post-operatively. The results showed: (1) The mean VAS data ranged from 35.1mm to 59.2mm; The Numerical Scale data ranged from 3.5 cm to 5.9 cm; the Face Rating Scale data: the 1st, 2nd and 3rd times were the 3rd face and the 4th time was the 2nd face; the Glasses Scale data; the 1st, 2nd times were the 3rd glass while the 3rd and the 4th times were the 2nd glass; the Words Descriptive Scale data were a little pain. (2) The children liked the Face Rating Scale the best followed by the Visual Analogue Scale and Glasses Scale. (3) As to reflex their pain intensity, which the children could easily use was Face Rating Scale and then Glasses Scale. (4) There was a significant relationship between the data collected from the VAS and Numerical Scale (p<0.001); also, there was a significant relationship between the Face Rating Scale and Glasses Scale (p<0.001). Conclusion: This study proved that using multiple methods helped to assess post-operative children's pain correctly. For pain evaluation in the pediatric patient, the "face rating scale" may be the best. The results of this study could be used to help the medical staff understand more about children's perception of the post-operative pain and improve the application of pain assessment scales. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。