頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 仍是現實主義的傳統--九一一與布希主義=Still the Realist Tradition--September 11 and the Bush Doctrine |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳玉山; | 書刊名 | 政治科學論叢 |
卷 期 | 17 民91.12 |
頁 次 | 頁1-31 |
分類號 | 578.852 |
關鍵詞 | 九一一; 布希主義; 現實主義; 美國外交政策; September11; Bush doctrine; Realism; Clash of civilizations; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 九一一的恐怖攻擊行動對於國際關係理論產生了很大的衝擊。自從冷戰後期以來,原本在國際關係理論中執牛耳的現實主義典範便受到新自由主義的抨擊。冷戰結束了,更有建構主義的興起,也是以現實主義為敵。而九一一似乎顯示著杭廷頓文明衝突論的正確性。連續受到這麼多理論的衝擊,現實主義是否仍然能夠提供現存國際關係的有效解釋?這個問題構成了本文的主要關切。在文中我們探索了九一一攻擊行動的根源、現實主義受到的衝擊,和國際體系對於九一一的反應。在國際體系反應的這一部份,又包括美國的布希主義和各國對於布希主義的反應。我們發現九一一的根源是反現代化的伊斯蘭激進主義,因此對於恐怖主義的攻擊者而言,這是文明衝突。然而就國際體系的反應而言,不論是布希主義的戰略思惟、操作方式、或是影響成果,還是各國對於布希主義的反應,都是依循著現實主義的理路。因此就國際關係理論的發展而言,九一一實質上凸顯了現實主義的有效性。 |
英文摘要 | The September 11 incident has an enormous impact on international relations theories. Towards the end of the Cold War, neoliberalism had mounted attack on realism, the hitherto dominant paradigm in the field. With the end of the Cold War, constructivism joined the assault on realism. The September 11 incident apparently shows the validity of Samuel P. Huntington's "clash of civilizations" theorem. Can realism survive this whole series of assault in the post-Cold War, post-September 11 world? This is the main concern of the article in which we explore the root of the September 11 attack, the impact on realism, and the way international system responds to the shock. We find the September 11 attack was motivated by Islamic anti-modernization radicalism, which testifies the validity of Huntington's "clash of civilizations" paradigm. However, the response from the international system, whether the Bush Doctrine with its strategy, operation mode, and impact, or the response to the Bush Doctrine by the world countries, clearly follows realist postulates. Hence the validity of realism as an approach to international relations is vindicated by the September 11 incident and its impact. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。