頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論庾信〈哀江南賦〉的負面評價--以全祖望指其「失節」為論點=A Study of Negative Evaluations of Yu, Xin's “Ai Chiang-Nan Fu”--Based on Quan, Zu-Wang's Point about Yu, Xin's Immorality |
---|---|
作者 | 謝嘉文; Hsieh, Dora; |
期刊 | 輔大中研所學刊 |
出版日期 | 20021000 |
卷期 | 12 民91.10 |
頁次 | 頁291-312 |
分類號 | 851.436 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 庾信; 哀江南賦; 負面評價; 全祖望; 失節; |
中文摘要 | 庚信其人及其作品的評價,自古自今,正面評創較多,然清全祖望認為庾信〈哀江南賦〉中「天醉」二句是為「自文」來埋藏自己「失節」的過失。吾意不然,竊以為此乃全氏對於當代的「裂冠毀冕」者感到悲憤,因而借古諷今,故其評論庾信乃基於自身的當代意識,有其時代侷限;再者,庾信身處動亂的時代中,既無鄉可歸,以不能隱居山林,在無可奈何之中,也只能仕北,且當時人對於奉事二朝似乎司空見貫;又全祖望言其「失節」,若無進一步的說明,是不合理的,況且庾信的心始終是傾向梁朝的,他的〈哀江南賦〉處處可以見其鄉關之思,庾信在亂世之中尚且能時時自我反省,這是值得令人稱道的。 |
英文摘要 | So far, although there are more positive evolutions than negative evaluations of Yu, Xin’s character and his literatures, Quan, Zh-Wang from Ching Dynasty thought the two sentences, “Tian Zui”, in Yu, Xin’s “ai Chaing-Nan Fu” are used to hide his immorality. However, three pints are introduced in the paper as follows, the first is Quan, Zu-Wang’s values is influenced by the value of Ching Dynasty; the second is Quan Zu-Wang’s ignorance of Yu, Xin’s situation; the third is Quan, Zu-Wang’s ignorance of the value in the Liang Dynasty. Quan, Zh-Wang’s points about Yu, Xin’s immorality is not objective. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。