查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 無神論者的精神承諾:評布洛赫的「基督教馬克思主義」=The Spiritual Promise of the Atheist: Critique on Ernst Bloch's "Christian Marxism" |
---|---|
作 者 | 曾慶豹; | 書刊名 | 中原學報 |
卷 期 | 30:4 2002.12[民91.12] |
頁 次 | 頁517-529 |
分類號 | 216.5 |
關鍵詞 | 希望; 烏托邦; 上帝成為人; Hope; Utopia; Homo homini deus; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 布洛赫通過了神秘化了的革命將基督教徹底的轉化成世俗社會的資源,所以我們並不能簡單化的以為「基督教化的馬克思主義者這樣的變種僅僅是布洛赫個人詮釋的成品。恰恰相反的是,我認為布洛赫背後所根據的正如洛維特(KarlLowith)所論證的,沒 有「基督教的歷史哲學」作為支架,不僅無法實現徹底的革命理想,甚至革命本身的意義也將變得模糊不清或不知所為何事。一種馬克思主義的「中申學詮釋學」是必要的,正如庫瑪(KrishanKumar)正確的指出: 1"沒有宗教式的支撐,沒有宗教最能提供的那種信仰和情感的結構,烏托邦就可能完全無法在大的規模上,在內心深處激發人們的響應」正是這個理由,布洛赫不僅把基督教變成了革命哲學,將無神論與基督教在人類學和存有論上取得了神(秘)學的一致性,更是把革命取得了末世天啟般的地位,無怪乎柯拉柯夫斯基(LeszekKolakowski)稱他為「未來式的靈知」(futuristic gnosis)的馬克思主義者。 本文所論及的「無神論者的精神承諾」即是在費爾巴哈的神學人類學批判中建立起來的。費爾巴哈對基督教神學的批判在布洛赫那裡並非消極地作為對基督教神學的否定,相反的,布洛赫看到了費爾巴哈「人額學」中的「秘密」這個秘密即表現在「上帝為何成了人」的論述上,費爾巴哈成了基督教神學的「完成者」這項「秘密」就表 現在布洛赫對於基督教神學的遺產的繼承上。 |
英文摘要 | Bloch,through mystical revolution ultimately transformed Christianíty into the resources of secular society, thus we cannotsimplytaken “christianizedMarxism" such a mutated being as merely the product of Bloch's personal interpretation precisely the opposite, 1 understand the rational behind Blochis just like Karl Lowith's argument, without "Christianity's philosophy of history" as frame structure, not only that it would not thoroughly actualized the revolutionary ideal, even the meaning in revolution it self may also become ambiguous or aimlessly lost. A kind of Marxist “theologicalherme neutics" is necessary, Just as Krishan Kumar rightly pointed out:“without the religiously support, nor religion can best supply the kind of faith and emotional structure, utopian can hardly on a macro scale, at the inner most being stimulate human responses," precisely this reason, Blochnot only taken Christianity as a philosophy of revolution, also do with atheism and Christianity in anthropology and existentialism and achieve a coherent on mysticism, even more so achieved for revolution an eschatological apocalyptical position, no wonder Leszek Kolakowski also recognized him as an futuristic gnosis of Marxist. This essay studies the“spiritual promise of the atheist", that is within Fauerbach's critique of theological anthropology that it was constructed. Fauerbach's critique of Christian theology in Bloch'sposition is not only a pessimistically denial of Christian theology, on the opposite, Blochperceived the “mysticalsecret within Fauerbach's anthropology, this secret reflected in the argument on "why has God become human", Fauerbach thus became forChristian theology the“perfector", and this “secret"thus revealed in Blochon the succession of the heritage on Christian theology |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。