查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 有限與無限--從黑格爾來看龍樹的中道思維
- 室內單頻噪音主動控制
- 變異與緣起--試論黑格爾與龍樹的核心思想
- 同一與差異--從唯物辯證法之基本原理來看龍樹的中道思維
- An Application of MATLAB Programming Language for Singal Processing Analysis
- Eigenstructure Assignment for Stabilizable Singular Systems
- 斯賓諾莎「倫理學」論神八大定義範疇釋疑
- 適用於DMT VDSL之多帶濾波器設計
- 不同播種期對有限型及無限型大豆生育與產量的影響
- 利用FPGA完成FIR及IIR數位濾波器
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 有限與無限--從黑格爾來看龍樹的中道思維=Finitude and Infinitude--A Hegelian Viewpoint of Nagarjuna's Middle Way of Thinking |
---|---|
作者 | 顏永春; | 書刊名 | 揭諦 |
卷期 | 4 2002.07[民91.07] |
頁次 | 頁265-301 |
分類號 | 147.51 |
關鍵詞 | 緣起; 變異; 對立統一; 有限; 無限; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文主要的目的是論證出,黑格爾與龍樹在批判一般的形上學時所依據的觀點是一致的。假如一般的形上學堅持有一個「無限」的事物,可以在質的方面是有別於一個「有限」的事物,並且認定唯有前者才是唯一值得追求的對象,那麼此種觀點終將難逃黑格爾與龍樹的批判。從兩者所持的原理 (變異與緣起) 出發,所謂的「有限」與「無限」的真實關像一定是既相異,也統一。所以,一般形上學把兩者完全割裂的做法是不符合事實的情況。 |
英文摘要 | The main purpose of this paper is to argue that Hegel and Nagarjuna based their respective criticisms of general metaphysics on concordant views. If general metaphysics insists on positing something `infinite', qualitatively different from finite things, and takes it to be the only object worth pursuing, then such a view would hardly escape the criticisms set forth by Hegel and Nagarjuna. In the light of the principles - becoming and dependent arising - upheld by both of them, the so-called true relationship between the finite and the infinite must be both unitary and divergent. Thus, the dichotomy between finitude and infinitude affirmed by general metaphysics does not accord with facts. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。