頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 玄學與政治的對話--郭象《莊子注》的三個關懷=The Dialogue between Mysticism and Politics: The Political Thought of "Annotation of Chung-Tsu" |
---|---|
作 者 | 林俊宏; | 書刊名 | 政治科學論叢 |
卷 期 | 16 2002.06[民91.06] |
頁 次 | 頁29-61 |
分類號 | 121.33 |
關鍵詞 | 莊子; 玄學; 自生; 獨化; 跡與所以跡; 無; 有; Nature and norms; Emerge of oneself and self-development; Tracing and trace; Non-action; Non-being and being; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 郭象的《莊子注》作為玄學後期的作品,深刻地處理了關於政治秩序的建構問題,本文試圖從三個面向探討。「自生與獨化」的面向處理了「無」與「有」的對立到統一的過程,郭象透過自生與獨化的觀念批判進而改造了「無中生有」的命題,說明了自生與相因的相關性,進而調和了存在於「無」(個人)與「有」(團體)之間的對立;「自然與名教」的面向則關注於個人秩序與集體秩序之間的緊張性消解,面對文化政治二元結構的不合理性,郭象試圖在個人與政治間探求一個足以安生立命的價值系統以資因應,郭象一方面承認名教與自然之間的差異,另一方面進行著調和兩者的理論舖陳,在這兩種心態交互作用下,原先具有傾軋桎檔特性的名教,也可以有條件地接受與承認,郭象於是運用了詭辭的方法將老子的「常」與莊子大化流行的主張,來了一個權宜性地轉變,使得社會規範與個體自主性之間得以妥適地對應;「無為與政治角色」的面向,可以視為郭象政治理想的理念與實踐之論述,儒家與道家的思維,在郭象的論述中得到極佳的榫接,郭象試圖建構一個「無為」的政治秩序,是一個統治者與被統治者之間並不存在著隔閡,且是相因而生與相輔而成的政治秩序,一方面謹守人本的道德色彩,重視個人的生存價值與需求,一方面也追求統治的集體成就與正當性;郭象在《莊子注》中堅持了「個人」在論述中的重要地位,也試圖填補與「社會」之間的罅隙,如果「調和政治哲學的論爭未嘗不是一 種緩解人間秩序惡化的努力」,正是透過這樣的緩解,郭象消解了存在於現實政治中的嚴重對立,建構了他所要的「重建秩序」。 |
英文摘要 | This paper deals with three issues that link mysticism and politics in 《Annotation of Chung-Tsu》 by Guo Xiang. First of all, the issue found in "emerge of oneself and self-development" tries to unlock the paradox in "non-being and being". We may find a higher ontological construct like Tao in 《Annotation of Chung-Tsu》, and by which, the deadlock issue of "non-being and being" in "Zhen-Shi mysticism epoch" has been solved. The issue of "Nature and norms" which was the fundamental concern during Wei-Jing epoch reveals the essential tension between individuals and the political community. Different from the proposition of "norms come from nature", Kuo-Xiang, by discoursing the dialectical relation of "tracing and trace", leaded to the proposition of "nature is norms" that release the tension. The issue of "Non-action and political roes" discusses the ideal political order of Taoist and how could it be achieved. By emphasizing the importance of political leader (king), Kuo-Xiang combined the essences of political leader in Confucian School and Taoist School and stressed the differentiation of political roles. There are some interesting questions, such as the ranking of root and branch, the importance ranking between individuals and community, physically or mentally emphasizing viewpoint, body formation in state building process and etc. hidden in traditional Chinese political philosophy. This paper also tries to answer the questions above by finding out some clues in the text. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。