查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- A Study of Automated Parallel Test Construction Methods Based on IRT and Classical Test Theory
- 從心理計量的觀點看測量工具的發展
- 電腦化適性測驗題庫之品質管理策略
- 在自動化編製平行測驗程序中使用古典試題指標與IRT試題參數之比較
- 經驗貝氏估計在項目反應理論上之應用
- 項目反應理論應用於學業性向測驗之可行性探討
- 項目反應理論在人格測驗之應用--以KMHQ-1993的測驗資料為例
- 項目反應理論應用於大學聯考:以多元計分模式分析倒扣題型
- Some Measurement Anomalies (What to do and not to do About Them)
- 遠距測驗--Dear CAT的設計與實施
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | A Study of Automated Parallel Test Construction Methods Based on IRT and Classical Test Theory=應用IRT及古典測驗理論於自動建構平行試卷之研究 |
---|---|
作 者 | 潘靖瑛; | 書刊名 | 慈濟大學人文社會科學學刊 |
卷 期 | 1 2002.06[民91.06] |
頁 次 | 頁153-211 |
分類號 | 521.32 |
關鍵詞 | 電腦自動組成試卷; 平行試卷; 項目反應理論; 古典測驗理論; Automated test construction; Parallel forms; IRT; Classical test theory; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究檢視五種平行試卷組成的方法,其一以人工方式組成平行試卷,餘者皆以電腦方式自動組成平行試卷。這五種方法又同時採用「項目反應理論」及「古典測驗理論」作為組成平行試卷的理論基礎,各別組成一對平行試卷,故總計產生十對平行試卷。而本研究的首要目的在了解採用電腦自動組成試卷法所產生的平行試卷在品質上能否與人工法組成的平行試卷相匹比。第二個目的則在檢測以「古典測驗理論」為基礎所組成的平行試卷與以「項目反應理論」為基礎所組成之平行試卷,其品質有無優劣之分。第三個目的則在評比四種電腦自動組卷之方法後,找出何者最實用且最有效率。 本研究使用「項目反應理論」及「古典測驗理論」的參數、平行測驗之間的相關係數、試卷所涵蓋的內容範圍、組卷所消耗的運作時間,以及測驗使用者與測驗專家對所組成平行試卷的評量來檢視這五種方法所組成的平行試卷的品質。 由上述評量參數的結果發現,使用電腦方式自動組成之平行試卷與人工法組成之平行試卷,在品質上幾乎沒有不同。但相較於人工組卷方式,電腦自動組卷方式則可節省大量的時間。因此,電腦自動組卷方式應用於平行試卷的組成是十分實用且有效率的。至於使用「項目反應理論」及「古典測驗理論」所分別組成之平行試卷,其品質十分相近,幾無區別,但相較於「項目反應理論」,「古典測驗理論」則更簡單且容易操作。再者四種電腦自動組卷方式中,以Network法在大多數檢驗的參數上表現優於其他三種自動組卷方式,且可以與人工法所組成之平行試卷相媲美,尤其是在使用「項目反應理論」組成平行試卷的應用上效率更佳。 |
英文摘要 | In this study, the empirical performance of five parallel test construction methods was examined. There is one manual test assembly method and four automated test assembly methods. Both IRT theory and classical test theory were applied to the five methods to generate ten pairs of parallel forms. The first purpose of this study was to determine if the automated parallel test construction methods truly generated the same quality parallel forms as the manual test assembly method did. The second purpose of this study was to examine if the quality of the parallel forms produced by IRT and classical test theory were the same. The third purpose was to evaluate which one of the four automated methods was most practical and efficient. The IRT and classical test theory criteria, the correlation among the parallel forms, the content coverage, time consuming, and the evaluation from the test users and psychometricians were all used to evaluate the parallelism of the forms constructed by all methods. Based on the evaluation results of all criteria, the quality of the parellel forms generated by automated methods is almost equal to the quality of the forms generated by the manual test assembly method. The automated method did save much time compared with the manual test assembly method. Thus the automated methods are practical and efficient. The parallel forms created by the IRT and the classical test theory methods are of approximately the same quality. However, the classical test theory methods are easier to be processed than IRT methods. The performance of Network method is superior to the other three automated methods on most of the criteria, especially when constructing parallel forms by using IRT. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。