查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 船山《易》學的原理與方法--〈周易內傳發例〉的解析
- 黑格爾論分析認知與綜合認知
- Sequence Analysis of Two Membrane-Associated Protein Genes of a Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus, Taiwan MD-001 Strain
- 農場財務分析綜合指標之建立
- 作物品種抗病穩定性之測驗與SAS電腦程式設計
- 由綜合指標分析臺灣地區治安狀況之研究
- 綜合所得稅二維條碼申報系統之建構與成效評估
- 我國工具機產業力思突破之道
- 整合地理資訊與多評準決策模式於公共工程年度計畫執行之應用模式--以臺中縣排水工程決策的優先順序為例
- Effects of Office System and Educational Interventions in Increasing the Delivery of Preventive Health Services: A Meta-Analysis
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 船山《易》學的原理與方法--〈周易內傳發例〉的解析:The Doctrine and Method of Wang Chuanshan's Interpretation of the I-Ching |
---|---|
作者 | 邱黃海; Chiu, Hwang-hai; |
期刊 | 鵝湖學誌 |
出版日期 | 20020600 |
卷期 | 28 2002.06[民91.06] |
頁次 | 頁149-195 |
分類號 | 127.1 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 分析; 綜合; 辯證法; 方法與原理合一的解經法; 四聖一揆; 易為君子謀不為小人謀; 即占以示學; 聖人則圖畫卦; 太極; 乾坤並建; 乾坤並建而捷立; 無所不極; 卦體的解釋問題; Analysis; Synthesis; Dialectics; The interpretive principle of the unity of doctrine and method; The consistency of four saints; The role of divination in becoming a gentleman rathen than a petty person; Learning to be a gentleman by conulting the diagrams; The saint's composition of eight trigrams according to the river chart; Taiji; The co-establishment of the principles of Qian and Kun; The principle that "no end cannot be reached"; The interpretation of the construction of "trigram"; |
中文摘要 | 目前學界對船山《易》學的研究大部分是集中在論題內容的闡釋。稍有涉及方法 者,往往說:船山的思維方式是一種「兩端而一致」的辯證法。本文的目的是透過<周易內 傳發例>的解析來說套三個論題。第一是要說明:船山的思維式嚴格說並不是辯證法,因為 ,船山並不從矛盾對立,而總是從「一致」這個角度來了解兩端。第二,船山的思維方法雖 然不是辯證法,但仍然是一種綜合性的思路,而他的綜合思考模式並不可離開他的義理觀點 而了解。事實上,他的各種不同的綜合方式都是由他的義理觀點所決定的。第三,船山的義 理觀點不僅僅決定了他的概念的綜合方式,同時也決定了他解釋《周易》的方式。本文的重 心就全部落在:船山概念的綜合方式、解釋《周易》的方式與其義理觀點之關係的展示上。 |
英文摘要 | Previous studies of the Chuanshan's interpretation of I-Ching focus on its doctrines. Additionally, there has been a popular opinion that Chuanshan's mode of thinking is dialectical in emphasizing the unity of two extremes. The purpose of this article is to justify three themes through a detailed analysis of the article "The Principles Setting in the Inner Commentary of Chou-I". The first theme explains that Chuanshan's mode of thinking is not dialectical because Chuanshan understood the two extremes as consistent rather than as contradictory. Second, although Chuanshan's mode of thinking is not dialectical, it is nevertheless synthetic. His mode of synthesis, further, is not to be understood outside his fundamental worldview. In fact, his different modes of synthesis are determined by his fundamental worldview. Third, his ontology determines not only his modes of synthetic thinking, but also his mode of interpreting the I-Ching. The gravity of the article lies in unfolding the relations of Chuanshan's ontological views, his synthetic modes, and his mode interpreting I-Ching. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。