查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 市場、國家、與法律--戰後臺灣經濟發展與經貿法律體系互動之考察
- 貿易政策的政治經濟分析:經濟學與政治學分析方法的評析
- 中國大陸廣播影視集團政策的政治經濟分析
- 亞太經合會政經發展與我國因應之道
- 美國的管制行政
- Asia-Pacific Economic Integration and External Constraints on the Formation of the Chinese Economic Area
- 北美自由貿易協定對墨西哥政治的影響--國際政治經濟學之解析
- 兩岸於WTO中互動對兩岸關係之影響--與APEC比較
- 俄羅斯與兩岸的經貿關係
- 總統大選後臺灣對外關係之探索--以經貿為內涵的外交之再評估
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 市場、國家、與法律--戰後臺灣經濟發展與經貿法律體系互動之考察=The Market, the State, and the Law--The Post-WWⅡ Interaction of Economic Development and Economic and Trade Law in Taiwan |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 陳維曾; | 書刊名 | 思與言 |
| 卷 期 | 40:1 2002.03[民91.03] |
| 頁 次 | 頁39-124 |
| 專 輯 | 臺灣法律與臺灣社會專輯 |
| 分類號 | 551.2 |
| 關鍵詞 | 法律史; 法律社會學; 經濟; 貿易; 政治; Legal system; Economy; Sociology of law; Legal history; Trade; Political science; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文兼從宏觀角度及法律體系內部的角度,觀察經貿法律體系在臺灣經濟發展過程之角色、功能與其變遷軌跡。方法上,透過經濟發展之行動者與法律體系間的互動,勾勒出經貿法律與經濟發展間之關連,並進而探討法律體系如何制約行動者的行為,而行動者行為又如何影響法律體系。 本文觀察指出,戰後迄今的臺灣經貿法律體系,呈現四大發展階段:(一)經貿管制建立期的經貿法體系(1945∼1960);(二)發展主義掛帥下的經貿法體系(1060∼1980);(三)政經轉型動盪期的經貿法體系(1980∼1987);(四)政經們由化下的經貿法體系(1987∼迄今)。各期中呈管制、補助、去管制、去補助、自由化、再管制等不同特色,彼此交互配套,成為不同階段中國家帶動發展經濟的工具。同時,法律體系所提供之合法性與正當性的意涵,也在不同階段與國家統治正當性關連起來,影響著這國家、資本家等不同行動者的行動策略。 |
| 英文摘要 | The article discussed the relation between the economic & trade law and the economic development in Taiwan after World War II from an internal perspective of legal system as well as an external perspective. The author described the forgoing relation by observing the interaction between the legal system and the actors in the economic development process. The author indicated that there were four periods presenting characteristics of legal system during the process of economic development as follows: (1)1945-1960: legal system under the buildup of high regulation policy; (2) 1060-1980: legal system under the rapid economy development; (3) 1980-1987: legal system under the politic and economic crisis of the state.; (4) 1987-now: legal system under the liberalization and democratization. The legal system, consisting of characters of regulation, subsidization, de-regulation, liberalization and re-regulation, became an efficient tool for the state to lead the market. However, because of the legitimacy that the legal system could provide for the state, it also influenced the behaviors and strategies of actors including state, labors and capitalists during the economic development process. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。