查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 虛構的自我還是建構的自我--從大腦科學到社會建構論=Fictitious Self or Constructive Self: From Brain Sciences to Social Constructionism |
---|---|
作 者 | 邱惟真; | 書刊名 | 暨大學報 |
卷 期 | 6:1 2002.03[民91.03] |
頁 次 | 頁129-143 |
分類號 | 172.1 |
關鍵詞 | 自我; 大腦科學; 社會建構論; 虛構的自我; 建構的自我; 實證主義; 建構主義; Self; Brain sciences; Social constructionism; Fictitious self; Constructive self; Positivism; Constructionism; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文試圖以「自我」這個主題促使「大腦科學」以及「社會建構論」兩個領域進行對話。「大腦科學」認為我們的大腦生來只記憶事情的主旨,而不是去記憶事情的細節,再加上左腦「解釋者」的機制,為了把知覺到的訊息同化,使其成為一個可以理解的整體,而犧牲了正確性。因此,「自我」是虛構的。「社會建構論」接受記憶的缺點,但卻進一步地指出,個體在發展一個自我敘說時,個體會想去建立生活事件和生活事件間連貫的一致性連結,會將生活事件理解成系統性的相關,這種故事的創造可能是給個人生活意義和方向的。因此認為,「自我」是建構的。 |
英文摘要 | This study focuses on the theme of "self" to promote dialogue between the "brain sciences" and "social constructionism". The brain sciences argue that brains are used to memorize the substance of an event, not to memorize the details of an event. The apparatus of "interpreter" in the left-brain assimilates perceived message to the whole of understanding but sacrifices correctness. Therefore, the "self" is fictitious. Social constructionism accepts defects of memory and argues that in developing a self-narrative, the individual attempts to establish coherent connections among life events, to understand life events as systematically related. Such creations of narrative order may be essential in giving one's life a sense of meaning and direction. Therefore, the "self" is constructive. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。