查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Awarding Passes in the Language Proficiency Assessment for Teachers of English: Different Methods, Varying Outcomes
- 網路時代英語教師的角色
- 從英語教師專業角色認同談英語教學--七縣市教學研習會訪察報告
- 國小英語教師的成長和國小英語教學
- 如何成為一位理想的國小英語教師
- 國中英語教師之自我專業成長
- 遠來的和尚會唸經?--國民小學英語教學教師與臺北美國學校交流活動紀實
- 國小英語教師對溝通式教學的詮釋與看法
- 臺中縣「國小英語教師師資培訓班」實施成效調查分析
- 國小英語教師師資培訓班學員對「英語教學活動設計」及師資培訓課程看法之調查研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Awarding Passes in the Language Proficiency Assessment for Teachers of English: Different Methods, Varying Outcomes=英文科教師語文能力評核的及格標準--方法不同,結果各異 |
---|---|
作者 | Coniam, David; 龔大胃; Falvey, Peter; |
期刊 | 教育學報 |
出版日期 | 20011200 |
卷期 | 29:2 民90.冬 |
頁次 | 頁23-35 |
分類號 | 522.1 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 英語教師; 能力評核; |
英文摘要 | This article examines the results which have emerged from the first live administration of the Language Proficiency Assessment for Teachers of English (previously known as the English Language Benchmark Test). The article examines the method by which pass marks (or “cut scores”) are calculated for each paper. In particular, the article examines the two methods by which pass marks may be arrived at for the two formal scale-based tests (the Writing Test that comprises five scales, and the Speaking Test that comprises six scales.) The first method requires test takers to achieve a pass (Level 3) on every scale (the “pass-every-scale” method); the second method bases a pass on test takers achieving an overall average of Level 3 (the “aggregate” method). In order to provide comparative data by which to view the results of the live administration, the article examines the results of the Writing Test and the Speaking Test from the Pilot Benchmark Assessment (English) (PBAE) administered in 1999. The PBAE was a test bed for the benchmark assessment framework now being implemented. By providing a context for the results of the live administration, the article describes how pass marks can vary by as much as 20% using the two different methods of calculation. The article concludes with the comment that the recommendation that test takers should pass every scale was proposed with the laudable intent of “raising standards.” This well-intentioned move, however, is perhaps losing sight of the Education Commission’s original intention with regard to the investigation of benchmarks, i.e., the establishing of a minimum standards test for English language teachers. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。