頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 周海門的學派歸屬與「明儒學案」相關問題之檢討=Clarification of the Position of Zhou Ru-deng in the Yang-ming School and Examination of Some Relevent Problems of Ming-ju hsueh-an |
---|---|
作 者 | 彭國翔; | 書刊名 | 清華學報 |
卷 期 | 31:3 2001.09[民90.09] |
頁 次 | 頁339-374 |
分類號 | 112.6 |
關鍵詞 | 周海門; 明儒學案; 黃宗羲; 泰州學派; 浙東陽明學; Zhou Ru-deng; Ming-ju hsueh-an; Huang Tsung-hsi; The school of T'ai-Chou; Yang-Ming Learning of the East of Zhejiang province; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 黃宗羲在《明儒學案》中將周海門作為羅近溪的弟子而歸人泰州學案,海內外研究者歷來皆沿襲此說,並未深究。本文以各種相關原始文獻為據,詳細考證《明儒學案》中周海門學派歸屬的失實。指出無論從地域、思想傳承還是自我認同來看,周海門都應當作為王龍溪的弟子而歸入浙中王門。在此基礎上,本文進一步分析了黃宗羲在周海門 學派歸屬問題上有違學術客觀性的原因。依本文之見,黃宗羲撰寫《明儒學案》時面臨思想界批判陽明學為禪學的巨大壓力,將周海門作為羅近溪弟子歸入泰州學派,目的即在於盡可能劃清浙東陽明學與禪宗的界限,維護前者的聲譽。黃宗羲的做法不僅扭曲了周海門的學派歸屬,更割斷了浙東陽明學由王陽明→王龍溪→周海門→陶望齡等人的傳承線索。由於《明儒學案》早已成為治明代思想史尤其儒學史的基本文獻,其學派劃分也歷來被研究者以為依據。因此,有必要充分反省並檢討其中的問題,使現行的研究不至因前提或出發點上的問題而窒礙難通、漸行漸遠。 |
英文摘要 | In Ming-ju hsueh-an, Huang Tsung-hsi took Zhou Ru-deng as the disciple of Lo Ju-fang and put the former into T'ai-chou hsueh-an. Almost all the researchers at home and abroad always take Huang's formulation for granted and do not probe this question. Based on many original historical documents, this study will inspect and testify it was a pseudomorph to clarify Zhou Ru-deng into T'ai-chou School and point out that Zhou Ru-deng should be regarded as the disciple of Wang Chi and clarified into Che-chung School, whatever the elements of region, intellectual continuity and self-identification were taken into consideration. Furthermore, this study will analysis why Huang Tsung-hsi deviated from the truth of the intellectual history. According to this study, As Huang Tsung-hsi compiled Ming-ju hsueh-an, the criticism that the teaching of Wang Yang-ming was or combined with Chan Buddhism was prevailing everywhere. Huang put Zhou into the T'ai-chou School just in order to make a distinction between the teaching of Wang Yang-ming and Chan Buddhism. As a result, the construction of Huang not only distorted the School belonging of Zhou Ru-deng, but also cut off the intellectual genealogy in Zhejiang Province from Wang Yang-ming via Wang Chi to Zhou Ru-deng. Because Ming-ju hsueh-an was taken as a basic original document of Confucian intellectual history of the Ming, and the School clarification of it has been used as the ground of now academic research, it is necessary to reflect and probe the problem of it so as to give a right starting point for our further study. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。