查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 解析歐盟阿姆斯特丹條約=Analysis on the Treaty of Amsterdam: Influence and Challenges to the EU' Decision-making Procedure |
---|---|
作 者 | 藍玉春; | 書刊名 | 政治科學論叢 |
卷 期 | 15 2001.12[民90.12] |
頁 次 | 頁15-44 |
分類號 | 578.1641 |
關鍵詞 | 阿姆斯特丹條約; 歐洲聯盟; 馬斯垂克條約; 歐洲統合; Treaty of Amsterdam; Treaty of Maastricht; European Union; European integration; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文嘗試解析修改馬斯垂克條約的阿姆斯特丹條約對歐盟統合之影響。在導論之後,第二、三章主要在探討阿姆斯特丹條約的成果,即其增修條款、創新設計、及主機構間之權限互動。如:第三支柱之局部共同體化安排、增強第二支柱可操作性之設計、高峰會實權進一步明文化、擴張歐洲議會權限、及可能預舖共同體化有利琱境的加強合作條款。第四章則探究阿姆斯特丹條約的缺失及限制。如:在第二搬柱侑第三支柱皆可引援的緊急煞車條款、未能解決執委會委員在大小國間之配額、亦未能重新分配部長理事會之加權票數。此外,第五章則分析四個主要行為者(執委會、法、德、英國)於條約談判羕間之態度,以進一步瞭解造成條約成果及缺失之主要因素。最後將就阿姆斯特丹條約對歐盟統合之意涵及(可能)影響做一結論。 |
英文摘要 | This essay tries to analyze the positive outcomes, the unfulfilled expectations and the unsolved problems of the Treaty of Amsterdam, amending the Treaty of Masstricht. The first part of the essay8 makes focus on what are probably most significant innovations of the Treaty: such as the communautarization of the third pillar of the Union (Justice and Home Affairs), the legalization of the so-called enhanced cooperation, the nomination of a M. CFSP, and the prospect of the integration of the WEU to the Union, the participation of the Commission at the common foreign policy, and the simplification of the co-decision procedure between European Parliament and the Council. The second part of the essay analyzes the limitations and the new challenges brought by the Treaty on the Union's decision-making procedure: such as the Emergency brake clause, the failure of the Amsterdam Treaty settlement to resolve the problems of the Qualified Majority Voting threshold, and the numbers of the Commissionners. These arguments lead to the conclusion: Amsterdam treaty, no matter how imperfect it is, represents a modest and gradual institutional reform on the Union, and the members of the Union need surely another negotiation to achieve the institutional reform for the next enlargement coming up. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。