查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 歐洲聯盟共同外交暨安全政策體制與運作方式改革之研究=European Union Common Foreign and Security Policy: Structured and Operational Reforms |
---|---|
作 者 | 沈玄池; | 書刊名 | 美歐季刊 |
卷 期 | 14:3=139 民89.秋 |
頁 次 | 頁263-304 |
專 輯 | 「阿姆斯特丹條約與歐洲聯盟」學術研討會專題.2 |
分類號 | 578.1641 |
關鍵詞 | 歐洲聯盟; 歐洲共同體; 共同外交暨安全政策; 歐洲政治合作; 馬斯垂克條約; 阿姆斯特丹條約; 歐盟高峰會; 歐盟執委會; 歐洲議會; European union; EU; European community; EC; Common foreign and security policy; CFSP; European political cooperation; EPC; Maastricht treaty; Amsterdam treaty; European council; European commission; European parliament; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 歐洲聯盟(以下簡稱歐盟)之前身-歐洲共同體(以下簡稱歐體)自一九七○年代初期起,即進行所謂的「歐洲政治合作」。歐洲政治合髼在推動之初係只類似會員國之間的君子協定,並無簽訂條約以為法律依據,直至一九八七年「單一歐洲法」生效之後才取得法律基礎。儘管如此,它僅為歐體會員國之間的合作機制,仍有別於歐體之運作方式。 一九九三年十一月一日,歐盟馬斯垂克條約(以下簡稱馬約)生效,涵蓋昔日歐洲政治合作的歐盟共同外交互安全策已被列入歐盟的法律架構之內,而成為歐盟組織架構三大支柱之一。在馬約的規範下,各會員國應秉持忠誠和相互團結之精神,支持並確保歐盟制定與實施共同外交暨安全政策,這均有別於昔日政治合作之合作關係。不過,若我們從歐盟處理前南斯拉夫內戰的例子看來,歐盟推展共同外交互安全政策的功效仍十分有限。 體制以及在運作方式上缺失乃是構成歐盟共同外交暨安全政策無法有效的被推行的最主要原因之一。因此,如何改善這其中之缺失遂成了歐幻統合能否進一步被推展的主要關鍵。不過,若從一九九九年五段一日生效的姆斯特丹條約的內容看來,其成效仍十分有限。歐盟會員國在主權問題方面不原意作進一步讓步,以及會員國之國家益不易整合似乎就是此一機制無法獲得進一步改善的主因。 |
英文摘要 | Since the Maastricht Treaty came into effect in November 1993, the activities of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) of the European Union (EU) have been merged into the broader framework of the EU. CFSP has become one of the three pillars of the structure of the EU. According the provisions of the CFSP, the member states shall actively and unreservedly support the Union's external and security policy in the spirit of the loyalty and mutual solidarity. This is different than the structure of the former "European Political Cooperation," which was similar to cooperation under a "Gentlemen's Agreement." Observing the efficiency of the CFSP toward the civil are in former Yugoslavia, however, demonstrates that the effectiveness of the CFSP is very limited. This ineffectiveness can be attributed to drawbacks in the structure and operation of the CFSP. Therefore, how to improve these weaknesses becomes the most important task facing the European politicians. If we observe the contents of the Amsterdam Treaty which came in to effect in May 1999, however, we find that the effectiveness of treaty is very limited also. What is the crux of the problem? What are attitudes of the different member states toward this issue? This study attempt to examine such questions. This study that the structure and operation of the CFSP are not easily improved because individual members are not willing to abandon national diplomatic independence and national sovereignty. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。