查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 何晏貴無論探析=An Enquiring to He Yan's Thought of "On Treasuring Nothingness" |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳德和; | 書刊名 | 鵝湖學誌 |
卷 期 | 27 2001.12[民90.12] |
頁 次 | 頁33-61 |
分類號 | 123.1 |
關鍵詞 | 何晏; 道; 無; 老子; 莊子; He Yan; Dao; Nothingness; Lao-Tzu; Chuang-Tzu; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 何晏「貴無論」的思想學界早有論述,然未必恰當公允,本文乃重新予以探討分析, 以明其義蘊並構做評價。本文首先處理〈無為論〉和〈道論〉的內容,結果發現何晏「以無 為道」的主張,惟有在認同莊子精神哲學的立場下,才能獲得善解,因此筆者斷定,何晏其 實是採取和莊子同一個基調去了解老子思想的;其次,基於上述之發現,筆者特以莊子思想 為準據,逐一解讀〈無名論〉的全文,再度證明了此方法既可明白疏通原有章句的糾葛,也 更有效釐清了通篇義理的底蘊,由此益加肯定何晏和莊子在思想上的密切關係;最後則對「聖 人有情無情論」的爭議另做裁決,筆者指出何晏的「聖人無情論」並非以為聖人一如土石, 而是然聖人之雖有情但不固執其情,這和莊子的看法正相吻合,若王弼的備聖人有情論」其 實仍不外乎何晏的主張。筆者既徹底董理何晏思想的相關文獻,乃確信他的「貴無論」應該 屬於莊子一路者,亦即他們同樣都是將老子的「道」內在化和心靈化,因此我們惟有從莊子 學說的觀點法了解,才能夠有效掘取其中應有的精采,並扭轉長期以來視保晏為王弼之附庸 的偏差觀念。 |
英文摘要 | Scholars of Chinese philosophy have long discussed HeYan's thought of 'On Treasuring Nothingness'. The author of this paper tried to re-analyze the context of HeYan's thought, and gave it a new evaluation. The author studied HeYan's articles 'On Do-nothingness' and 'On Dao', and found that HeYan's idea 'Taking Nothingness as Dao' had the same spirit of Chuang-Tzu. That meant HeYan and Chuang-Tzu took the same position in interpreting the philosophy of Lao-Tzu. The author then used Chuang-Tzu's idea to interpret HeYan's article 'On Anonymousness' and also found out their close relations in thinking. Finally, the author pointed out that HeYan's article 'On Saint's Heartlessness' followed the thought of Chuang-Tzu. Hence, the author concludes that both HeYan and Chuang-Tzu absorbed and digested the philosophical thought of Lao-Tzu into their ideas. They made the Dao of LaoTzu spiritualized and discoursed from their heart. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。