查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 對拉納、田立克「神學人類學」的批判=A Critigue on Rahner and Tillich's "Theological Anthropology" |
---|---|
作 者 | 曾慶豹; | 書刊名 | 中原學報 |
卷 期 | 28:2 2000.06[民89.06] |
頁 次 | 頁69-75 |
分類號 | 242 |
關鍵詞 | 拉納; 田立克; 先驗; 終極關懷; 象徵; Rahner; Tillich; Transcendental; Ultimate concern; Symbol; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | The understanding of theology as a kind of anthtopology, and a critique based on it on theology and religion, mainly began and inspired by Ludwig Feuerbach. But theologians often purposely shy away from Feuerbach "s ctitique, time and again, fall into the nest of anthropologised theology, and no doubt, it caused theology unavoidably invites severe criticism. The construe of 'theology as anthropology' is a modern version of the classical 'Nature Theology', be it in the Catholic or Protestant theological enterprise, it is considered as main stream. This study selected two most respected theologians, Karl Rahner and Pual Tillich, analyses and critique on their theological anthropology, and argues that and kind of theological anthropology will fall into the danger of reducing God or Faith as a theme of anthropology, and thus shaken the truly legitimate position of theology. The main argument of this study is that the consequence of Rahner and Tillich's theology come from the fact that they have not understood the ontological and action theory implication of 'language', and that through the symbolic interaction, theology can only then stand against the citicism of Feuerbach, and that the fate of theology will then be able to be free from being anthropologised. |
英文摘要 | 將神學理解作人類學,並以之作為對神學或宗教的批判,主要是由費爾巴哈 ( Feuerbach )所啟動的,可是, 神學家對於費爾巴哈的批判常常是有意的迴避,並視若 無目睹的再一次的落入神學人類學化的窠窟中,無疑的,這將使得神學無可避免的遭來批判 。把神學作人類學的解釋,是古典自然神學的現代變種,不管是天主教或新教陣營的神學界 ,都還算得上是主流思潮。本文選擇極富盛名的兩位神學家一卡爾拉納 (Karl Rahner )與 保羅田立克 (Paul Tillich) 的「神學人類學」做出分析和批判,指出任何類型的「神學人 類學」將危及上帝,使得神學溶入一種人類學的化約,以及動搖其合法性地位。本文主要的 論點是,拉納和田立克的神學後果來自於他們沒有真正理解到「語言」的存有論和行動論的 意涵,因為只有通過「語言」的關係互動,神學才經得起費爾巴哈的批判,神學才可能真正 擺脫人類學化的命運。 |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。