查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 陰極射線映像管型電腦終端機電磁場暴露評估
- 極低頻電磁場之人類致癌效應--回顧近期之流行病學文獻
- 職業暴露於極低頻電場與磁場之危害與防護
- Intensity and Variation of In-home Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Fields in an Urban Sample of Residences Near High-voltage Transmission Lines
- 極低頻電磁場暴露與癌症之流行病學--文獻探討
- 電磁場與人體健康效應之評估與探討
- Emergency Medical Resource Use in Taipei City
- 腸炎沙門氏桿菌污染之三明治引起的集體食品中毒事件
- 機動車事故傷害發生地、死亡地與戶籍地關係之初探:花東經驗
- Pharmacoepidemiology藥物流行病學--clinical pharmacology(臨床藥理學)和epidemiology(流行病學)結合而產生的一門新學科
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 陰極射線映像管型電腦終端機電磁場暴露評估=Exposure Assessment of Electromagnetic Fields Emitted from Visual Display Terminals with Cathode Ray Tube |
---|---|
作 者 | 李中一; 林瑞雄; 宋鴻樟; | 書刊名 | 勞工安全衛生研究季刊 |
卷 期 | 9:3 2001.09[民90.09] |
頁 次 | 頁241-254 |
分類號 | 412.78 |
關鍵詞 | 視覺顯示終端機; 電磁場; 暴露評估; 流行病學; Visual display terminal; Electromagnetic fields; Exposure assessment; Epidemiology; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究選定桌上型個人電腦終端機(VDT)共29台,測量VDT所產生頻率為20-30kHz之電磁場強度以瞭解:1.VDT之特徵是否會影響所產生之電磁場強度?以及2.VDT螢幕前方與操作者座位上方兩處所量測到之電磁場強度是否有差異?本研究利用HOLADAYTM MODEL HI-3603 VDT/VLF RADIATION SURVEY METER進行電場與磁場之測量。但於測量方法則依1992 ANS/IEEE(C95.1-1991)所規範之測量準則進行之。該準則包括,分別測量電場與磁場,使用前之校正,針對每一個測量點,測量時間為6分鐘,電場或磁場強度則為6分鐘時量平均值。測量結果發現:座位正上方30公分處所量測到之電場與磁場強度平均值分別為0.49V/m與8.63mA/m(或0.11mG),而螢幕尺寸與此處之電場強度有顯著正相關。螢幕中心點正前方50公分處所量測節之電場與磁場強度平均值則較高,分別為1.29V/m與38.4mA/m(或0.48mG),而與此處電場強度有顯著相關之VDT特徵則包括VDT廠牌與VDT之使用年數;本研究數據也顯示,殺醮使用護目鏡與兩處之電場強度並無顯著相關性,而VDT之特徵也與兩處之磁場強度無顯著相關。本研究數據也顯示:兩處磁場測量值間之相關性高於電場測量值間之相關性(r=0.558 vs r=0.356),而無論是VDT前方或座位上方所測量到電與磁場值間之相關性均得低,相關係數分別為-0.252與0.153。本研究建議,未來流行病學研究進行VDT暴露評估時應分別測量電場與磁場之強度,此外,也應考慮VDT之特徵對電場強度之影響,並在選擇測量點時,宜考慮此測量點之電磁場是否能反應暴露評估器官之位置。 |
英文摘要 | This study seeks to measure potential exposure to very-frequency (20-30 kHz) electromagnetic fields (EMF) at visual display terminal (VDT). Two questions were addressed. The first question focused on whether the EMF varies with the characteristics of VDT. The second issue determines whether exposure to electric and magnetic fields varies with measuring locations at the terminal. We performed measurements at a distance of 30 cm above the seat of the VDT operator in the working position-an approximate location of VDT users' reproductive organs (site A) ad at a distance of 50 cm in front of the screen (site B). A convenient sample of 29 VDTs was selected for measurement. A HOLADAYTM MODEL HI-3063 VDT/VLF RADIATION SURVEY METER was used for measurement. The measurement procedure was based on the 1992 ANSI/IEEE (C95.1-1991) standard which requires separate measurement of electric and magnetic fields, calibration before use, and calculation of the 6-minute time-weighted-average for each site being measured. Results showed that the average electric and magnetic fields measured at site A were 0.49 V/m and 8.63mA/m (or 0.11 mG), respectively. The corresponding figures for site B were higher at 1.29 V/m and 38.4 mA/m (or 0.48 mG), respectively. The electric fields were found to be positively associate with the size of VDT at site A; while at site B, both the brand and age of VDT were associate. It appeared that the use of filter is unrelated to electric fields and VDT characteristics posed no effect on magnetic fields. Results also indicated that the correlation for magnetic fields between site A and site B was stronger than that for electric fields (r=0.558 vs r=0.356). There was no significant correlation between electric and magnetic fields, irrespective of where they were measured. This study suggests that future epidemiological studies should separately assess electric and magnetic fields in exposure assessment. Additionally, exposure assessment of electric fields should take VDT characteristics into consideration, and the EF of VDT should be measured at approximate positions in studying its health implications. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。