查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 淨土詮釋傳統中的宗門意識--論宋天臺義學者對元照「觀無量壽經義疏」之批判及其所造成之反響
- Pure Land Hermeneutics in the Song Dynasty: the Case of Zhanran Yuanzhao (1048∼1116)
- 微觀經濟調控宏觀經濟--看大陸金融政策的困境
- On Estimating the Effects of Events Like the Asian Financial Crisis: A Mesoeconomic Approach
- Effects of a Demand Shift in Macroeconomies: A Two-Sector Mesoeconomic Analysis
- 博物館參觀經驗之比較--省美館與科博館為例
- 工研院光電所[電腦視覺檢測與量測自動化]
- 大陸通貨緊縮型經濟增長之分析
- 近期大陸經濟增長與波動的分析
- 揭開溫州白象塔「觀經」殘頁之謎
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 淨土詮釋傳統中的宗門意識--論宋天臺義學者對元照「觀無量壽經義疏」之批判及其所造成之反響=Sectarianism in the Pure Land Hermeneutic Tradition: On T'ien-t'ai Exegetes' Critique of Yuan-chao's Commentary on the Contemplation Sutra and the Repercussions of the Critique |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 黃啟江; | 書刊名 | 中華佛學學報 |
| 卷 期 | 14 2001.09[民90.09] |
| 頁 次 | 頁309-352 |
| 分類號 | 226.5 |
| 關鍵詞 | 觀經; 新疏; 扶新論; 輔正解; 道因; 戒度; 元照; 宗門意識; Contemplation Sutra; Hsin-shu; Kuan-ching Fu-hsin Lun; Fu-cheng-chieh; Tao-yin; Chieh-tu; Yuan-chao; Sectarianism; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文所討論的主題──宋代天台義學者在詮釋《觀無量壽經》時所表現的「宗門意識」(sectarianism)──代表淨土詮釋傳統�堣@個很值得注意的現象。這現象之出現,可追溯到靈芝元照對《觀無量壽經》所做之新詮釋。由於元照之觀經疏有擇取諸家舊疏之長,而被視為有尊善導疏而抑智顗疏之傾向,遂受到宋天台義學僧草菴道因之批判。本文詳析道因對元照義疏所做的各項指控,及天台學者自吳克己至志磐等一脈相承的宗門意識。 由於道因對元照義疏之批判以《輔正解》一書之面貌出現,而其原書今已不存,只見於拙菴戒度《觀經扶新論》之引文中,本文亦根據戒度所錄之文,評估其書內容,說明它對元照義疏批判之強烈宗門意識。 拙菴戒度為聲援元照義疏而著《觀經扶新論》,反駁《輔正解》對元照義疏之指控,切中道因議論之弊。他指出道因為「建立門庭」而作《輔正解》,故意扭曲元照新疏之看法,強行批判,故其說理不勝辭,破綻隨處可見。道因為強烈之宗門意識所驅使,致使其在《輔正解》之議論充滿偏見,而吳克己、宗鑑、志磐等人卻附和其說,可見道因宗門意識對天台山家派義學影響之深。 |
| 英文摘要 | The topic of this paper─sectarianism as expressed in Sung T'ien-t'ai scholars' exegeses of the Contemplation Sutra─represents a noteworthy phenomenon in the Pure Land hermeneutic tradition. The phenomenon owes its occurrence to Ling-chih Yuan-chao's exegesis of the Contemplation Sutra. As Yuan-chao's commentary electively synthesizes the fine points of previous exegeses, it was perceived by Ch'ao-an Tao-yin, a Sung T'ien-t'ai exegete, as honoring Shan-tao's commentary at the expense of that of Chih-i. This paper details Tao-yin's accusation of some hermeneutic points found in Yuan-chao's commentary and relates the persistent sectarianism that characterizes the works compiled by T'ien-t'ai historians from Wu K'e-chi to Chih-p'an. Tao-yin's critique of Yuan-chao's commentary appears as a text called Fu-cheng-chieh, which is no longer extant but survives, in fragments, as interspersed quotes in the Kuan-ching fu-hsin lun by Chuo-an Chieh-tu. Based on this remainder of the Fu-cheng-chieh, this paper also assesses the text, discusses its contents, and reveals the sectarianism that underpins its criticism of Yuan-chao's hermeneutics. Chuo-an Chieh-tu wrote the Kuan-ching fu-hsin lun to uphold Yuan-chao's commentary. In his work, he refutes Tao-yin's accusation of Yuan-chao's ommentary, pointedly listing the flaws of the Fu-cheng-chieh and showing Tao-yin's sectarian sentiment. In his view, Tao-yin, purporting to “build up [T'ien-t'ai's] gate and yard," wrote the Fu-cheng-chieh in which he deliberately distorted Yuan-chao's viewpoints and engaged in an acrimonious attack on Yuan-chao's commentary. As a result, it is full of errors and flaws. Driven by unyielding sectarianism, Tao-yin infuses in his discourse with much bias, which was to inspire such T'ien-t'ai scholars as Wu K'e-chi, Tsung-chien, and Chih-p'an. It shows clearly that his sectarianism had a large impact on T'ien-t'ai's Pure Land exegesis. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。