查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | A Tentative Hypothesis on Income Distribution in Developing Countries=開發中國家所得分配的一個假設 |
---|---|
作 者 | 宋青柳; | 書刊名 | 景文技術學院學報 |
卷 期 | 12(上) 民90.09 |
頁 次 | 頁51-58 |
分類號 | 551.25 |
關鍵詞 | 開發中國家; 所得分配; Income distribution; Level of economic development; Dependency; Participation; Regime type; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本論文主要目的是要探討開發中國家,影響所得分配的主要因素。學者曾提出四種解釋。一種是顧志耐的曲線解釋。他認為在經濟發展的初期,所得分配會愈來愈不公,等經濟發展到一個程度之後,才會轉而趨向較公平的分配。第二種解釋是依賴理論,認為依賴程度愈深的國家,所得分配愈不公平。第三種理論是階段論,認為在發展過程中有不同階段,各階段各有其面對的問題,而菁英分子面對問題所選擇的政策將影響所得的分配。最後一種解釋則是政權解釋,認為民主政權的所得分配比威權政體要來得更公平。本論文一方面檢驗這四種理論,說明其缺失。為何有些國家可以同時發展,又能避免所得分配不公的趨勢,作者提出自己的假設,並且以臺灣為例子來說明。 |
英文摘要 | Why can some states maintain or increase their growth without damaging the equality while the others cannot? Scholars from different fields have developed basically our kinds of explanation. The developmental view of Kuzents suggests curvilinear relationship between them. At the lowest level of economic development, income inequality is as low as it is in the highly developed societies; however, with the progress of economic development, inequality increases to the highest level in correspondence to certain level of economic development, and then decreases. The dependency theorists contend that dependency on the world capitalist economy is the primary reason accounting for the income inequality in the Third World states. Huntington and Nelson classified the development of the developing countries into two phases. It is up to the choice of strategies by elites at each phase that determines the destiny of developing countries. The last argument focus on regime type. It argues that income distribution is more equal in democratic regimes than that in authoritarian regimes. The purpose of this paper is, first, to examine the existing explanations, and then suggest a tentative hypothesis to explain the deviant cases. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。