查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 公民德性、市民社會與主權國家:現代市民社會論述之探討=Civic Virtue, Civil Society and the State: An Interpretation of Modern Civil Society |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡英文; | 書刊名 | 政治科學論叢 |
卷 期 | 10 1999.06[民88.06] |
頁 次 | 頁83-112 |
分類號 | 541.44 |
關鍵詞 | 公民德性; 市民社會; 主權國家; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 市民社會概念在十八世紀蘇格蘭啟蒙時有一政治經濟學的轉折,市民社會被解釋 為純粹的經濟活動,企求個人與集體財富的累積,而不與宗教信仰、公民責任或政治德行有 所關連。本文以此為出發點討論現代市民社會 -- 相對於古典共和的「公民社會」 -- 的論 述的某些重要議題。本文以弗格森、黑格爾與馬克思為主闡釋現代市民社會論述糾纏於公民 德性、商業資本主義與主權國家的互動關係。最後,以解說當代波蘭思想家科拉考夫斯基對 馬克思市民社會論述之批判為結論,論證現代市民社會論述若企圖統合多元分歧與對立的因 子,譬如,市民與政治之社會,以及人之認同的分裂分離,終究會走向專制支配的途徑。 |
英文摘要 | The concept of civil society in eighteenth century's Scotland had a economical transition in that civil society is interpreted as a pure economic activity, aiming at individual and collective wealth, and delinking with religious faith, civic duty and political virtue. This essay begins with that conception of civil society to discuss the conceptual formation of modern civil society and its polemics. It is concerned with the complicated relationship of civic virtues, commercial capitalism and sovereign state. And with regard this, it tried to explicate the civil society discourses of Adam Ferguson, Hegel and Marx. Finally, it is concluded with Leszek Kolakowski's critique of Marx's civil society, arguing that modern civil society, insofar as to unify myriad and heterogeneous factors in modern society (such as the separation between civil and political society, and the conflict identity between citizen and bourgeoisie) inevitably leads to despotism. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。