頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 「語義悖論」之統一解--作為多義句的「語義悖論」=A Unified Interpretation of Semantic Paradoxes--Semantic Paradoxes as Sentences of Multiple Meanings |
---|---|
作 者 | 張鐵聲; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 28:4=323 2001.04[民90.04] |
頁 次 | 頁349-358+383 |
分類號 | 150 |
關鍵詞 | 邏輯哲學; 悖論; 語義悖論; 多義句; 單義句; 無效證明; 反證法; 歸謬法; Philosophy of logic; Paradox; Semantic paradox; Sentence of equivocal meanings; Univocal sentence; Apagoge; Reductio ad absurdum; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文旨在解決如何解釋「語義悖論」這一邏輯哲學重大難題。主要結論為:(一)這些語句均為多義句;(二)這些語句均有無窮多種語義,且在每種語義下均取唯一確顁之真值,故而絕非論;(三)先前關於這些語句為自相矛盾之證明均視之為單義句,犯有偷用假前提之錯誤,故而均為無效證明。 |
英文摘要 | The aim of this paper is to solve an important logical problem--how to explain semantic paradoxes. The main conclusions are as follows: First, those sentences have equivocal meanings. Second, each of those sentences has countless meanings and takes a single truth-value under every meaning; therefore they are not paradoxes. Third, the proofs of the self-contradiction of those sentences were regarded as univocal. It means that those proofs make the same mistake of using a false premise and are therefore invalid. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。