查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 從比較的觀點看臺灣閩客語的互動: 以聲母層次為例
- A Concept Formation Experiment on the Nasality of Vowels in Taiwan Min
- 從優選理論觀點研究臺閩語輔音系統
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Coal Ash Artificial Reefs at Wan-Li, Northern Taiwan
- 記臺灣蘭科植物相新記錄種--緣毛松蘭
- 臺灣的氣候變化--氣溫和降水
- Change and Stability in the Dietary System of A Prehistoric: Coastal Population in Southern Taiwan: A Research Design
- Diurnal Vertical Distribution of Ichthyoplankton in I-Lan Bay, NE Taiwan
- 臺灣白鼻心之現況調查
- 《詩經.國風》與《臺灣國風》所隱現之情感教育
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | A Concept Formation Experiment on the Nasality of Vowels in Taiwan Min |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 王旭; |
作者姓名(外文) | Wang, Samuel H.; |
書刊名 | 語言暨語言學 |
卷期 | 2:1 2001.01[民90.01] |
頁次 | 頁183-195 |
分類號 | 802.5231 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 臺灣; 閩語; Taiwan; Min; Nasality; Concept formation; Experimental phonology; |
英文摘要 | In Wang 1996 we performed an experiment to test if the subjects treated the oral voiced stops and their corresponding nasal stops as the same phonemes. We found that the [b, m] pair and the [g, ŋ] pair were unambiguously accepted, while the [1, n] pair was equivocal, and tended to be regarded as different phonemes. We concluded from the results that the theoretical predictions were generally correct, but the /1/ phoneme was on the way to be split in two. In this present study we pursued the corollary question: whether the oral and nasal vowels were considered different four groups of subjects were recruited, with each group involving in one of four test conditions. In each test condition, the subjects were required to respond positively to the oral vowe [i], [e], [a] or [□] respectively, and negatively to other vowels. In the test session, the subjects tested on how they respond to the nasal counterpart of the target vowel in the learning session, i.e., [ĩ], [ĕ], [ã] or [□] respectively. The results showed that the test vowels received much more ‘yes’ answers than ‘no’ answers, meaning that they considered the nasal vowels to belong to the same category as the oral vowels. In other words, nasality is not important in to the same category as the oral vowels. In other words, nasality is not important in to the same category as the oral vowels. In other words, nasality is not important in vowels either. Therefore, we conclude that the segmental theory of the nasal phonemes in Taiwan Min is not supported by the results of this experiment. We propose an autosegmental theory in its stead, as outlined in Wang 1995. The validity of such a claim, however is a subject for further experimental research. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。