查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 便宜又大碗﹖從學者和圖書館的觀點看學術電子期刊=The Views of the Library and the Faculty on Electronic Publishing of Scholarly Journals |
---|---|
作者 | 蘇小鳳; | 書刊名 | 資訊傳播與圖書館學 |
卷期 | 7:3 2001.03[民90.03] |
頁次 | 頁73-81 |
分類號 | 051 |
關鍵詞 | 電子期刊; 學術出版; 教授升等; 使用者接受度; Electronic journals; Scholarly publishing; Faculty advancement; User acceptance; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 學術電子期刊聲稱成本較紙張印刷期刊低,人人皆可藉之快速、便捷的大量出版,此看似便宜又大碗的新管道是否真的能為學術界輕易地接受?學術出版管道最重其公認的水準和品質,本文以教授學者和圖書館的觀點出發,檢視目前電子刊的實用性(尤其是銅臭及現實的部分),以及電子期刊對他們和出版商之間互動所造成的影響及其造成的新衝突。短期內維持紙張印刷和電子形式並行的壓力將會很大,圖書館員和教授學者並不願輕易放棄已熟悉的紙張印刷期刊,最終選取哪一種形成,必得參考經費因素。 |
英文摘要 | Proponents of electronic publishing claim that scholarly electronic journals are cheaper than print. The internet ensures that the authors' papers are widely available day and night. Less optimistic views find that speedy publishing in electronic world will makes worse the overproduction of scholarship. Faculty in United States without tenure are concerned most about the academic promotion and rewards. They value the perceived quality of the journals. Price seldom plays a role. Electronic journals might not be as prestigious as established print journals due to the egg and chicken effect. The paper examines the following areas: the faculty's perceptions and acceptance of electronic journals; the increased tension among scholarly authors, librarians, and profit publishers in electronic publishing; whether or not electronic journals cost less than print. The paper concludes that we should neither abandon the print journals nor ignore the electronic journals in the near future. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。