查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 誰的「中國性」﹖--九十年代兩岸三地的後殖民研究=Whose Chineseness?--Postcolonial Studies in the Mainland, Taiwan and Hong Kong in the 1990s |
---|---|
作 者 | 朱耀偉; | 書刊名 | 香港社會科學學報 |
卷 期 | 19 民90.春-夏 |
頁 次 | 頁135-158 |
分類號 | 573.07 |
關鍵詞 | 兩岸三地; 後殖民; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 後殖民研究八十年代在歐美學院迅速冒起,這股後殖民旋風在九十年代席捲兩岸三地,赫然成為一門顯學。因為社會歷史情況各異,三地的後殖民論述重點亦有不同。本文嘗試瞄準後殖民論述九十年代在兩岸三地所引發的論爭,審視反霸權、本土性、身分認同等後殖民課題。中國大陸的「新保守主義」、臺灣的「本土性」和香港的「邊緣性」論爭都可連繫到闡釋「中國」的問題之上,本文嘗試將這些由後殖民論述引發的論爭導向「中國性」的重要問題,希望藉此管窺全球化年代的中國論述的生產場域,並帶出有關「靈活認同」的省思。 |
英文摘要 | postcolonial studies became one of the most popular critical trends in the Euro-American academic community in the 1980s. In the 1990s, the "postcolonial" wave began to dominate the cultural studies of Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong too. Due to the different historical contexts, the bones of contention related to postcolonial discourse in the three areas have been rather different. This article proposes to investigate the critical debates related to anti-hegemony, local consciousness and identity politics. The controversial issues of "neo-conservatism","local consciousness" and "marginality" in the Mainland, Taiwan and Hong Kong respectively can well be attributed to the problem of interpreting "China". This paper attempts to direct these debates towards the important notion of "Chineseness", hoping to shed light on the discourse on China in the age of globalization. This will hopefully bring forth another perspective to reflect on the notion of "flexible identity". |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。