查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 不同動作觀察對羽球技能學習效果的探討
- 興趣選項分組教學羽球技能之學習效果探討
- 不同的排球低手傳球教學進度編配之學習效果探討
- 視覺意像練習對高爾夫球果嶺推桿動作學習及保留效果影響之分析研究
- 學前經驗與人性因素對計算機學習效果影響的探討
- 以問題為基礎之學習在小班教學之應用
- A Study on the Efficacy of Audio-Visual Aids for Teaching Reading and Listening for Students At the Junior College Level
- 與日本人以「Inter Action」方式進行的學習活動--以日語為第二外語的「進階班」內進行的會話教學Project work + 實訪日本家庭
- 抓舉膝上發力技術之動作觀察分析模式與運動學分析之整合研究
- 國立高雄第一科技大學之「文學名著導讀」--推行「智慧培育」教學之實例
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 不同動作觀察對羽球技能學習效果的探討=Probe on the Badminton Skill Learning Effect of Different Action Observations |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳春安; | 書刊名 | 南臺科技大學學報 |
卷 期 | 24 2000.11[民89.11] |
頁 次 | 頁75-89 |
分類號 | 528.953 |
關鍵詞 | 動作觀察; 羽球技能; 學習效果; 保留效果; Action observation; Badminton skill; Learning effect; Retention effect; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究以南臺科技大學八十五學年第一學期二專女生84名為研究對象,將之平均分配於自觀組、他觀組、綜觀組與控制組等四個不同動作觀察組別內,接受六週、每週二小時的羽球正手發短球與高手擊長球動作技能實驗教學,並於學習前、後皆舉行測驗,且於完成後測間隔兩週再舉行保留測驗,所得資料用以探討各組學生其羽球技能學習效果、保留效果,並進而比較其差異情形。在本研究範圍內經討論分析獲致下列結論: 一、除控制組的羽球正手發短球外,其餘各組其正手發短球與高手擊長球的學習效果均具顯著性(P<.05)。 二、他觀組與綜觀組其羽球正手發短球技能的學習效果均顯著優於控制組(P<.05)。 三、他觀組與綜觀組其羽球高手擊長球技能的學習效果均顯著優於控制組(P<.05)。 四、在介入兩週的休息後,自觀組與綜觀組的羽球正手發短球,及綜觀組與控制組的高手擊長球均呈現復憶現象,其餘皆具良好的保留效果。 五、在介入兩週的休息後, 自觀組其羽球正手發短球技能的保留效果顯著優於他觀組與控制組(P<.05),且綜觀組亦顯著優於他觀組(P<.05)。 六、在介入兩週的休息後,自觀組與綜觀組其羽球高手擊長球技能的保留效果皆顯著優於他觀組(P<.05)。 |
英文摘要 | The research subjects are chosen from Nan Tai College female students. 84 subjects are divided into 4 different teams: self action observation, othersaction observation, both self & others action observation, no actionobservation. The forehand low service and forehand overhead clear of badminton skill learning study 2 hours a week for 6 weeks. Both having tests before andafter learning period, also having retention tests 2 weeks later when thestudy is finished. results indicate that the difference of the badminton skillearning effect and retention effect among the different teams. The conclusionis drawn as follows: 1. The learning effects of badminton forehand low service and forehand overhead clear are salient from the rest of teams except the forehand low service of no action observation (p<.05). 2. The learning effects of badminton forehand low service from others action observation, both self & others action observation are better than no action observation (p<.05). 3. The learning effects of badminton forehand overhead clear from others action observation and both self & others action observation are better than no action observation (p<.05). 4. The result of retention test indicates that the forehand low service of self action observation and others action observation, also the forehand overhead clear of both self & others action observation and no action observation present reminiscence, the rest of teams present retention effects. 5. The result of retention test indicates that the retention effect of forehand low service from self action observation is better than others action observation and no action observation (p<.05), also both self & others action observation is better than others action observation (p<.05). 6. The result of retention test indicates that the retention effect of forehand overhead clear from self action observation and both self & others action observation is better than others action observation (p<.05). |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。