查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Imagination, Subjectivity, and Wallace Stevens's “Supreme Fictions”
- The Marginalized Strike Back: Black Feminism on Postmodern Issues--Anti-essentialism, Identity Politics, High Theory
- 白先勇小說中的現代主義--《臺北人》的記憶與鄉愁
- 從後現代主義發現臺灣建築的主體性
- 當前歐美藝術思潮趨向對臺灣藝術暨藝術教育的啟示
- 批判的主體與主體的批判:知識分子的反抗與共謀
- 翻譯與地方文學生產:以王禛和小說《玫瑰玫瑰我愛你》為例
- 王文興小說語言主體性之生成初期探論
- 梵二會議前天主教神學發展的張力--新經院主義、現代主義與「返本溯源運動」的角逐
- 前衛運動、現代主義與後現代主義(2)
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Imagination, Subjectivity, and Wallace Stevens's “Supreme Fictions”=想像力、主體性、與史蒂文斯之「終極虛設」 |
---|---|
作 者 | 傅士珍; | 書刊名 | 東華人文學報 |
卷 期 | 2 2000.07[民89.07] |
頁 次 | 頁207-228 |
分類號 | 874.51 |
關鍵詞 | 想像力; 主體性; 終極虛設; 現代主義; 史蒂文斯; Imagination; Subjectivity; Supreme fictions; Modernism; Wallace stevens; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本文旨在探討史蒂文斯對主體性的處理。史蒂文斯相當關注浪漫主義所標舉的想像力問題,不斷於詩作中探索心識,現實,與虛構三者在書寫中,夾纏交錯的互動聯結。對一些研究現代詩的批評學者而言,浪漫主義深植於主體形上論,而史蒂文斯重回浪漫主義所建構的想像力觀念,終究難以跳脫主體中心主義,甚至是唯我論的藩籬。本文將指出,史蒂文斯的詩作事實上正質疑著主體形上論。史蒂文斯所提出的「終極虛設」的詩觀與實踐,將想像力的問題推向對主體質性的叩問,進而揭示主體之虛設結構,一如詩作等想像力的產物。 |
英文摘要 | This paper tries to explore Wallace Stevens's poetic treatment of subjectivity. Being concerned with the Romantic issue of the imagination, Stevens has made various attempts at poeticizing the intricate interactions of mind, reality, and fiction involved in the process of writing. For some critics, these attempts, addressing the Romantic construction of imagination, are so encumbered by the metaphysics of the subject embedded in Romanticism that they are, ultimately, articulating a subjectivist, even solipsistic, poetics. This paper argues that Stevens's works actually put the metaphysics of the subject at stake. Propounding the idea of poetry as "supreme fictions," Stevens makes further explorations into the issue of imagination and exposes the subject as fictive construction. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。