查詢結果分析
相關文獻
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 師院學生對氧化還原之迷思概念研究=A Study of Misconceptions on Oxidation and Reduction Held by Teachers College Students |
---|---|
作 者 | 王貴春; 黃萬居; | 書刊名 | 科學教育研究與發展季刊 |
卷 期 | 15 1999.06[民88.06] |
頁 次 | 頁19-38 |
分類號 | 522.643 |
關鍵詞 | 師院學生; 氧化還原; 概念認知; 迷思概念; Teacher college; Oxidation and reduction; Conception cognitive; Misconception; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究的主要目的在於探討師院生之氧化還原迷思概念,及其形成原因。研究結 果將有助於老師改善教學方法,並提供一些建議給課程發展者及教科書的編者,在設計課程 、及編寫教科書時宜謹慎使用語言。 本研究過程是採用質的研究方法。首先,先利用紙筆測驗測試市立師範學院 41 位數理教育 系及 30 位非數理教育系學生,並分析其測驗後的結果。然後再進行個別晤談。從分析紙筆 測驗及晤談的結果,條列出學生的反應,並進而找出學生的迷思概念。本研究也歸納師院生 有關氧化還原迷思概念可能的來源:1. 日常生活用語的隱喻;2. 不適當的類比產生的;3. 科學術語的混淆;4. 缺乏科學知識;5. 教師不當教學; 6. 以為依賴大量累積特殊的知識 就是學會概念了。 |
英文摘要 | The main purposes of this study were to investigate students' understanding of the concepts of oxidation and reduction, and to discover students' misconceptions. These results would be helpful for teachers to improve their teaching strategies. They could also offer some suggestions to textbook writers and curriculum developers to use the language carefully in the science textbook. The research approach is a qualitative method. At first, using paper-and-pencil test examined 41 science and 30 non-science students chosen in Taipei Municipal Teachers College, and analyzing the data of the test. And then, according to the results of the test, did individual interview. The data from paper-and-pencil test and interview were analyzed, and listed students' responses in order to find out misconception which were held by students. The study has also inducted the sources of teacher college students' misconception about oxidation and reduction: (1) wrong usage in everyday language, (2) an inappropriate analogy, (3) confusion of science language, (4) lack of scientific knowledge, (5) an inappropriate teaching, (6) of the opinion that he has understood conceptions depend on accumulating much special knowledge. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。